[Old Sarge]

We can send SEAL’s to save the oil, but not to save four lives in Benghazi.

[cloudmountain]

We can send SEAL’s to save the oil, but not to save four lives in Benghazi.

Yes, we can. If I were included in that "we" I would have sent the SEALs to Benghazi but the Commander-in-Cheese made the "other" decision, didn't he?

Apparently the "awl bidness" is more important to him and his minions. What else is new?

[rktman]

Supposedly this had approval from the “lyin’ king” so I guess we’re real, real lucky he’s on top of all this stuff huh? NOT! Did he also “dictate” a corpse-man be included in the detail?

[Navy Patriot]

We can send SEAL’s to save the oil, but not to save four lives in Benghazi.

Excellent observation.

The "Arab Spring" horse manure was always about controlling oil, cash flow and IMF banking for Europe in exchange for support of Islam and the subversion and co-opting of states to create the World Caliphate.

Obama chose dishonor and we shall have war.

[RandallFlagg]

We can send SEAL’s to save the oil, but not to save four lives in Benghazi.

Yeah.
Where's all of the, "NO BLOOD FOR OIL!!" lefty bums now?

[blueunicorn6]

That, is a good one.

[mongo141]

“We can send SEAL’s to save the oil, but not to save four lives in Benghazi.”
*****************
THAT’s different!/S