Posted on 03/07/2014 11:46:07 AM PST by nickcarraway
One of the most seismic changes in American politics over the last decade has been the emergence of a sharp generational split among the electorate. The Democratic Party owes its success in the last two presidential elections almost entirely to overwhelming support among the very young, which has overcome continued conservatism among older voters. The Pew Research Institute has dominated the field of exploring the ideological cleavages among different generations. And its latest survey shows again how the liberalism of the youngest voting cohort, millennials, remains firm, and likely to continue to recast the electorate. A few charts from the survey tell the tale. The first shows how, in previous elections, age didn’t matter very much – the young and old voted in mostly similar ways. But a generational cleavage started opening in 2004, and has remained unusually wide:
What is the source of this cleavage? Is it a mere reaction to the disaster of the Bush years, or rising social liberalism? Actually, younger voters are simply much more liberal than their elders across the board.
One way to measure the difference is to ask a generic question about the size of government. Now, there’s a venerable principle that states that Americans are ideological conservatives and operational liberals. They oppose bigger government in the abstract, and embrace the label “conservative” over “liberal,” but they tend to support specific government programs at a far higher level than these conceptual terms would imply. (Political scientist John Sides had a post yesterday updating this hardy reality.) Traditionally, self-identified conservatives outnumber self-identified liberals by a good 2-to-1, even when the partisan balance is close to even.
Millennials are not only far more likely to embrace the liberal label in comparison to voters in other generations, they’re more likely to call themselves liberal than conservative:
The same split can be seen on the question of preferring larger government or smaller government – that’s a way of framing the question that reliably produces huge majorities for small government among older voters, but amazingly yields support for bigger government among the young:
The chart above demonstrates something else. Conservatives have a double problems with millennial voters. The first is that they’re much less white than older voters, which means that, as time goes on, Republicans would need to get much higher voting margins among millennial whites merely to stay even. But the second problem is that millennial whites have more liberal views than older whites. Support for smaller government polls in the +40-to-+50 range among Generation X and Baby Boomer whites, but only +13 among millennial whites. Universal health insurance polls at around -20 points among older whites, but only -10 among millennial whites.
The conservative political analyst Sean Trende has argued that Republicans could return to parity even without repairing their standing among nonwhite voters by increasing their share of the white vote. Republicans may not have yet hit their ceiling of white support. But their most loyal white voters are aging out of the electorate (that’s a demographic euphemism for “dying”) while the white voters aging into the electorate are the least loyal to the party. And the change is happening fast – the proportion of millennials is expected, per Nate Cohn, to rise from about 18 percent of the voters in 2012 to 24 percent of the voters in 2016.
There are a few familiar, important caveats. First, Republicans are facing a midterm election they’re going to win — not only because the young tend not to vote in midterms, but also because the president’s party tends to lose midterms in general, the House map structurally favors the GOP, and this year’s Senate elections are held on overwhelmingly friendly turf for the GOP. Second, in any given election, a party can do well even if the broader structural factors are working against it. The 1970s were a terrible decade for Democrats, but Watergate helped them with the 1974 and 1976 elections. A recession or major scandal in 2016 would probably hand the election to Republicans.
But the overall picture is an electorate that is growing steadily more liberal on both social and economic policy, and whose views Republicans will eventually have to accommodate. I, for one, welcome our new liberal overlords.
And now...”The Young and the Stupid”.
The young hipsters raced to cast their votes for the young, hip, cool, black President.
Will they do the same for Hillary Clinton?
That is the 64 trillion dollar question.
Too bad very few of them can’t get a decent job; they just sit at their parents’ home and enjoy their liberalism and handouts.
I’ve heard younger voters don’t consider Hillary to be “too old to run.”
“What is the source of this cleavage?”
I dont know. Playboy magazine?
Then they haven’t seen a photo up close and un-airbrushed. During 2008 she looked AWFUL!
And besides that, they are all about being ‘cool’. This means you HAVE to ‘burn’ the Republican, no matter HOW awful they think their democrat candidate is.
The young, the shiftless, the unassimilable, and the entitled are the future and they will decide the fate of this country.
That girl in New Jersey who is suing her parents is probably typical.
“Is it a mere reaction to the disaster of the Bush years, or rising social liberalism?”
“Disaster of the Bush years”? That may be the biggest and most dishonest begged question I have seen in years. Good grief!
Demographics is destiny...
“Too bad very few of them can’t get a decent job; they just sit at their parents’ home and enjoy their liberalism and handouts.”
Ding, ding, ding! Folks, we have a winner for the Occam’s Razor Money Quote of the Day!
Uh, you do mean very few CAN get a decent job, don’t you?
That the young tilt left is nothing new. What has really screwed up American politics is that the senior vote, which in the past was reliably conservative, is now full of left leaning baby boomers.
I don’t have evidence to back up my assertion, but I call this ‘whistling past the graveyard’.
I think a lot of them have figured out that they were deceived. They may have been programmed by the education system, but most of them will eventually figure out the lies. Maybe it won’t be too late to avoid catastrophe . . . although time is running short.
If I were a young liberal, I’d worry about my student loans and finding a job instead.
You don’t think Bush putting Obama in office was a disaster?
No. She will be viewed as being way too old by the youths.
If a shift is coming it is in the opposite direction. No jobs, loss of hours, Obamacare, national debt, diminished prospects across the board.
This generation is being scrued and everyday more are recognizing just what the consequences of liberal policies are.
Yes they voted for all this and now its costing them big time. The difference is now its personal and it hurts. Just how HIP is it to be just another liberal zombie like your teacher, professor, community agitator or Joe Biden?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.