[OldArmy52]

1. Given $100, China puts more of that $100 into weapons and less into personnel pay. The USSA puts more of that $100 into personnel pay and less into weapons (well, admittedly mmillions are going into “green bullets” which cost more money, but are less hostile to “climate change”.

2. Yes, China has more young men and fewer young women due to “1 family, 1 child” policy. But who knows, maybe China will invade large USSA cities and like the Vikings of old, carry off spoils to include women. Which, based on experience in the singles dating scene, would be a gain to us and a loss to them......if they ran off with a lot of the Liberal, feminist, “don’t need a man” women with the character of Miley Cyrus or Madonna or their like.

[familyop]

"Which, based on experience in the singles dating scene, would be a gain to us and a loss to them......if they ran off with a lot of the Liberal, feminist, 'don’t need a man' women with the character of Miley Cyrus or Madonna or their like."

They'd keep 'em for a day, if they didn't mind the vast majority of 'em bein' old and dried up. There's not a whole lot of young folks these days.

[staytrue]

“maybe China will invade large USSA cities and like the Vikings of old, carry off spoils to include women. Which, based on experience in the singles dating scene, would be a gain to us and a loss to them”

I think you are spot on. The US women are safe. Now the women in Thailand and the Phillipines might have something to worry about.