Bill Clinton pictured posing with two PROSTITUTES at star-studded charity event in his honor

Daily Mail (U.K.) ^ | March 1, 2014 | Daily Mail Reporter

[Cyclone59]

the shadows always give it away. The “relative size” of the heads, the light behinds the chick on the right, the sharp contrast around Bill’s face. Many tell-tale signs that it is doctored.

I happen to agree with the comment about, this photo just made Hillary’s approval jump 6 points. We sure live in a really f’ed up world.

[USFRIENDINVICTORIA]

The relative size of the heads is perfectly consistant with the relative distances between the subjects, and the likely position of the camera. The flash on a cell-phone camera, or small digital snap-shot camera is only good for a few feet. The women’s skin is nearly over-exposed (consistent with a flash pic, taken in a fairly dark room).

Clinton is further back, and thus not overexposed. His ruddy complexion is a give-away for a flash photo. In a low-light situation, a straight-on flash tends to make some people look like that. The sharp contrast around Bill’s face is typical of a flash photo taken in dim ambient light Clinton looks exactly like he should look, if he were in the same flash photo as the working girls. An amateure Photoshopper wouldn’t have gotten that right.

The other two men in the photo are further back. Their relative head sizes appear to be quite consistent with the relative exposure from the flash. The light behind the brunette is perfectly consistent with a spot light shining from behind, off to her right, and lower down — probably a table lamp. Notice how it also catches part of the face of the guy behind her.

If this was photoshopped, it definetly wasn’t an amature job.