Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CT Sends Out Letters to Gun Owners: “Surrender, Destroy or Sell” Your ‘Assault Weapons’
The Gateway Pundit ^ | 2-27-2014 | Jim Hoft

Posted on 02/27/2014 11:37:06 AM PST by servo1969

Only 15% of Connecticut gun owners registered their military-style rifles with the state this year. 85% of ‘assault weapon’ owners flouted the law.

Now, the Connecticut is sending letters to gun owners telling them to “surrender, destroy or sell” your “assault weapons.” Guns Saves Lives reported:

It looks like some gun owners in Connecticut who tried to register their “assault weapons” (that’s the state of CT’s actual term for these firearms), but missed the deadline are now getting letters instructing them to destroy or surrender their firearms.

According the letter, posted on several message boards and online media sources, residents who failed to register their firearms must now take the following action:

1. Render the assault weapon permanently inoperable. 2. Sell the assault weapon to a licensed gun dealer. 3. Remove the assault weapon from the state; or 4. You may make arrangements to relinquish the assault weapon to a police department or to the Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection.

Those all sound like super fun options. So far, it looks like only owners who tried to register their firearms, but missed the deadline are getting the letters.

Here’s a copy of the letter:



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; US: Connecticut
KEYWORDS: banglist; connecticut; gunrights; secondamendment; tyranny
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last
Before law: Nobody's gonna take your guns. Stop being so paranoid.

After law: Turn 'em in, M-F-s! It's the law now!

1 posted on 02/27/2014 11:37:06 AM PST by servo1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: servo1969

If they didn’t register their guns how does the gov know who has them? Hmmm?


2 posted on 02/27/2014 11:39:06 AM PST by TigersEye (Stupid is a Progressive disease.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

And it won’t end in CT...


3 posted on 02/27/2014 11:39:08 AM PST by ButThreeLeftsDo (Support Free Republic!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

Or give them to your cousin in Georgia who likes to go fishing a lot


4 posted on 02/27/2014 11:39:51 AM PST by dennisw (The first principle is to find out who you are then you can achieve anything -- Buddhist monk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
If they didn’t register their guns how does the gov know who has them?

According to another story I read, these are the people who actually attempted to register them, but acted past the deadline. Nice reward for trying to obey the law, isn't it?

5 posted on 02/27/2014 11:41:03 AM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Fed collusion?


6 posted on 02/27/2014 11:41:15 AM PST by Dalberg-Acton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

Time for massive civil disobedience.

CT gun owners must hang together, or they shall surely hang separately.


7 posted on 02/27/2014 11:41:25 AM PST by Westbrook (Children do not divide your love, they multiply it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

If they come for your weapons give them to them BULLETS FIRST!


8 posted on 02/27/2014 11:41:42 AM PST by Renegade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

From the article I think that the letter went out to people who tried to register them but for some reason failed.


9 posted on 02/27/2014 11:42:03 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants (Haven't you lost enough freedoms? Support an end to the WOD now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: servo1969
"assault weapon". That is laughable. In the rights hands a spoon can be used as a weapon to assault.

I know it's easier to say than do, but I would remove my weapon from the state. Along with myself, my family, my belongings and my $$$. That state is going to turn into a hellhole very soon and I wouldn't want to be disarmed when its happening.

10 posted on 02/27/2014 11:42:14 AM PST by Ghost of SVR4 (So many are so hopelessly dependent on the government that they will fight to protect it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

Politicians in CT.are nuts!


11 posted on 02/27/2014 11:42:57 AM PST by plainshame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

IOW taking without compensation (via regulation)

The USSC already ruled you can’t take wihout compensation by using regulation.

Famous case where a city tried to control developement after the fact by regulation via prohibiting use of land they could not afford to buy.


12 posted on 02/27/2014 11:43:29 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

They should move and take their guns with them, their money with them and their skills and expertise with them and never buy another product from a COnnecticut based company.

I will never buy a product or use a service centered in Connecticut.


13 posted on 02/27/2014 11:43:30 AM PST by ZULU (Magua is sitting in the Oval Office. Ted Cruz/Phil Robertson in 2016.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

What’s the over/under on the answers being along the line of “NUTS!” ?

Just askin’....


14 posted on 02/27/2014 11:43:48 AM PST by castlebrew (Gun Control means hitting where you're aiming!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FReepers

Click The Pic To Donate

Support FR, Donate Monthly If You Can

15 posted on 02/27/2014 11:43:59 AM PST by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

What I can’t understand is how the state can “take” a legally acquired piece of property from somebody without due compensation - aside from the Constitutional Issues involved.


16 posted on 02/27/2014 11:45:03 AM PST by ZULU (Magua is sitting in the Oval Office. Ted Cruz/Phil Robertson in 2016.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Renegade

Indeed.

I’d give them an address of a ten acre field somewhere with a fortress in the middle, and lots of open ground.

After it was over, you can tweet, “We changed our mind at the last minute and decided to destroy those weapons. Sorry your guys made the trip out. Did any make the trip back?”


17 posted on 02/27/2014 11:45:31 AM PST by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ZULU
I will never buy a product or use a service centered in Connecticut.

No more Colts for you, eh?

18 posted on 02/27/2014 11:47:31 AM PST by grobdriver (Where is Wilson Blair when you need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: servo1969
I would send as a reply the following:
1. A copy of the Constitution
2. A photo of my middle finger.
3. A note that says MOLON LABE MOTHERF&^*ER
19 posted on 02/27/2014 11:48:35 AM PST by eyrish69 (Yellowstone Wolves - Smoke a Pack a Day!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZULU

Good Luck

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Connecticut_companies


20 posted on 02/27/2014 11:48:44 AM PST by King_Corey (www.kingcorey.com -- OpenCarry.org -- http://defcad.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson