Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Yet at same time, Obama is growing the size of Homeland Security.

He sees his threat to power will come from the inside, not from without.

We are warned

1 posted on 02/24/2014 7:55:16 AM PST by bestintxas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: bestintxas
Hey, let's shrink Hegel's pay, expenses, perks and pensions to pre-WWII levels.

That would be fair, right?

2 posted on 02/24/2014 7:58:44 AM PST by FroggyTheGremlim ("It is not the color of his skin, ... it is the blackness that fills his soul")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bestintxas

Will they drill with brooms, like before?


4 posted on 02/24/2014 8:04:07 AM PST by Old Sarge (TINVOWOOT: There Is No Voting Our Way Out Of This)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FReepers

Click The Pic To Donate

Support FR, Donate Monthly If You Can

5 posted on 02/24/2014 8:06:12 AM PST by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bestintxas
Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel is due to decrease the size of the U.S. Army
No he's not, he's just following orders from the CiC.
6 posted on 02/24/2014 8:06:54 AM PST by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bestintxas

Shrinking the Army to the size it was pre-WW2, when the population of the US was 125 million instead of today’s 300 million. Is really making it 1/3 as small on a per capita basis.


7 posted on 02/24/2014 8:14:16 AM PST by BuffaloJack (Freedom isn't free; nor is it easy. END ALL TOTALITARIAN ACTIVITY NOW.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bestintxas

Shrinking the Army to the size it was pre-WW2, when the population of the US was 125 million instead of today’s 300 million. Is really making it 1/3 as small on a per capita basis.


8 posted on 02/24/2014 8:14:29 AM PST by BuffaloJack (Freedom isn't free; nor is it easy. END ALL TOTALITARIAN ACTIVITY NOW.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bestintxas

Brilliant move! China and Russia are pussycats after all.


9 posted on 02/24/2014 8:23:57 AM PST by 12th_Monkey (One man one vote is a big fail, when the "one" man is an idiot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bestintxas

um, doesn’t the (alleged) Congress have a say, here?


10 posted on 02/24/2014 8:25:04 AM PST by Seaplaner (Never give in. Never give in. Never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bestintxas

Hey, what could go wrong?


11 posted on 02/24/2014 8:28:06 AM PST by muir_redwoods (When I first read it, " Atlas Shrugged" was fiction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bestintxas

Well since the regime has “fixed” the economy and unemployment (at least official stats) is no longer a problem, obviously there will be plenty of jobs for ex-GIs.

/s


12 posted on 02/24/2014 8:29:47 AM PST by nascarnation (I'm hiring Jack Palladino to investigate Baraq's golf scores.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bestintxas
We knew who Chuck Hagel was, before he was rammed down our throats.

I'm surprised he's not closing the military outright.

13 posted on 02/24/2014 8:31:18 AM PST by Lazamataz (Early 2009 to 7/21/2013 - RIP my little girl Cathy. You were the best cat ever. You will be missed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bestintxas

This really puts the squeeze on the officer ranks.

Its an ‘up or out’ system already. Now the number of slots to move ‘up’ into will be reduced.

The only officers who make it through the promotion gauntlet will be the ones who are pure as the wind driven snow, having never stepped out of line or tested the system in any way. No risk takers need apply...just yes men/women.

And I guarantee one of the pre-requisites for promotion will be slavish devotion to the new gay policies and notions that your average woman can be a Navy SEAL. I can see officers at the War College eschewing papers on troop maneuvers, and writing political science studies on the benefits of gay artillerymen.


14 posted on 02/24/2014 8:32:28 AM PST by lacrew (Mr. Soetoro, we regret to inform you that your race card is over the credit limit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bestintxas

Yet at same time, Obama is growing the size of Homeland Security.

“Weneed a National Security Force, just as big as the millitary”

So people thought that this was impossible due tot he fact that they would have a lot of growning, but didn;t realize that if you shrink the one the amount of growing for the latter would be reduced....


15 posted on 02/24/2014 8:34:36 AM PST by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bestintxas

Shrinking the military makes it easier to identify and retain those who are loyal to the regime and head off a mutiny of Constitutionalists.


16 posted on 02/24/2014 8:35:00 AM PST by Lion Den Dan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bestintxas

“Yet at same time, Obama is growing the size of Homeland Security. He sees his threat to power will come from the inside, not from without.”

There is the real story in all this. All the excuses for cutting DoD are being applied to DHS.


19 posted on 02/24/2014 8:48:09 AM PST by CodeToad (Arm Up! They Are!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bestintxas

For another attack?

A repeat of Pearl Harbor?


21 posted on 02/24/2014 8:48:49 AM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bestintxas
Lib/Pacifist/DemoCRAPS do this every time after a War and crash us right in to another War and Unprepared to defend ourselves.
31 posted on 02/24/2014 10:00:26 AM PST by SandRat (Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bestintxas

“the smallest since 1940...............”

And what happened in 1941?


33 posted on 02/24/2014 10:37:49 AM PST by CrazyIvan (Obama phones= Bread and circuits.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bestintxas

An important consideration is the effects of military spending on our economy. Most if not all technology has resulted from military spending.

This is about throwing money at the poor instead of investing in programs that will lead to advances in technology/jobs/the middle-class.


34 posted on 02/24/2014 10:52:27 AM PST by thejokker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bestintxas

When the next war comes Hagel will blame Georg Bush.


35 posted on 02/24/2014 3:11:36 PM PST by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson