Yet at same time, Obama is growing the size of Homeland Security.
He sees his threat to power will come from the inside, not from without.
We are warned
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
To: bestintxas
Hey, let's shrink Hegel's pay, expenses, perks and pensions to pre-WWII levels.
That would be fair, right?
2 posted on
02/24/2014 7:58:44 AM PST by
FroggyTheGremlim
("It is not the color of his skin, ... it is the blackness that fills his soul")
To: bestintxas
Will they drill with brooms, like before?
4 posted on
02/24/2014 8:04:07 AM PST by
Old Sarge
(TINVOWOOT: There Is No Voting Our Way Out Of This)
To: FReepers
Click The Pic To Donate
Support FR, Donate Monthly If You Can
5 posted on
02/24/2014 8:06:12 AM PST by
DJ MacWoW
(The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
To: bestintxas
Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel is due to decrease the size of the U.S. Army
No he's not, he's just following orders from the CiC.
6 posted on
02/24/2014 8:06:54 AM PST by
oh8eleven
(RVN '67-'68)
To: bestintxas
Shrinking the Army to the size it was pre-WW2, when the population of the US was 125 million instead of today’s 300 million. Is really making it 1/3 as small on a per capita basis.
7 posted on
02/24/2014 8:14:16 AM PST by
BuffaloJack
(Freedom isn't free; nor is it easy. END ALL TOTALITARIAN ACTIVITY NOW.)
To: bestintxas
Shrinking the Army to the size it was pre-WW2, when the population of the US was 125 million instead of today’s 300 million. Is really making it 1/3 as small on a per capita basis.
8 posted on
02/24/2014 8:14:29 AM PST by
BuffaloJack
(Freedom isn't free; nor is it easy. END ALL TOTALITARIAN ACTIVITY NOW.)
To: bestintxas
Brilliant move! China and Russia are pussycats after all.
9 posted on
02/24/2014 8:23:57 AM PST by
12th_Monkey
(One man one vote is a big fail, when the "one" man is an idiot.)
To: bestintxas
um, doesn’t the (alleged) Congress have a say, here?
10 posted on
02/24/2014 8:25:04 AM PST by
Seaplaner
(Never give in. Never give in. Never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
To: bestintxas
Hey, what could go wrong?
11 posted on
02/24/2014 8:28:06 AM PST by
muir_redwoods
(When I first read it, " Atlas Shrugged" was fiction)
To: bestintxas
Well since the regime has “fixed” the economy and unemployment (at least official stats) is no longer a problem, obviously there will be plenty of jobs for ex-GIs.
/s
12 posted on
02/24/2014 8:29:47 AM PST by
nascarnation
(I'm hiring Jack Palladino to investigate Baraq's golf scores.)
To: bestintxas
We knew who Chuck Hagel was, before he was rammed down our throats.
I'm surprised he's not closing the military outright.
13 posted on
02/24/2014 8:31:18 AM PST by
Lazamataz
(Early 2009 to 7/21/2013 - RIP my little girl Cathy. You were the best cat ever. You will be missed.)
To: bestintxas
This really puts the squeeze on the officer ranks.
Its an ‘up or out’ system already. Now the number of slots to move ‘up’ into will be reduced.
The only officers who make it through the promotion gauntlet will be the ones who are pure as the wind driven snow, having never stepped out of line or tested the system in any way. No risk takers need apply...just yes men/women.
And I guarantee one of the pre-requisites for promotion will be slavish devotion to the new gay policies and notions that your average woman can be a Navy SEAL. I can see officers at the War College eschewing papers on troop maneuvers, and writing political science studies on the benefits of gay artillerymen.
14 posted on
02/24/2014 8:32:28 AM PST by
lacrew
(Mr. Soetoro, we regret to inform you that your race card is over the credit limit.)
To: bestintxas
Yet at same time, Obama is growing the size of Homeland Security.
“Weneed a National Security Force, just as big as the millitary”
So people thought that this was impossible due tot he fact that they would have a lot of growning, but didn;t realize that if you shrink the one the amount of growing for the latter would be reduced....
15 posted on
02/24/2014 8:34:36 AM PST by
GraceG
To: bestintxas
Shrinking the military makes it easier to identify and retain those who are loyal to the regime and head off a mutiny of Constitutionalists.
To: bestintxas
“Yet at same time, Obama is growing the size of Homeland Security. He sees his threat to power will come from the inside, not from without.”
There is the real story in all this. All the excuses for cutting DoD are being applied to DHS.
19 posted on
02/24/2014 8:48:09 AM PST by
CodeToad
(Arm Up! They Are!)
To: bestintxas
For another attack?
A repeat of Pearl Harbor?
21 posted on
02/24/2014 8:48:49 AM PST by
Salvation
("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
To: bestintxas
Lib/Pacifist/DemoCRAPS do this every time after a War and crash us right in to another War and Unprepared to defend ourselves.
31 posted on
02/24/2014 10:00:26 AM PST by
SandRat
(Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
To: bestintxas
“the smallest since 1940...............”
And what happened in 1941?
33 posted on
02/24/2014 10:37:49 AM PST by
CrazyIvan
(Obama phones= Bread and circuits.)
To: bestintxas
An important consideration is the effects of military spending on our economy. Most if not all technology has resulted from military spending.
This is about throwing money at the poor instead of investing in programs that will lead to advances in technology/jobs/the middle-class.
To: bestintxas
When the next war comes Hagel will blame Georg Bush.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson