Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Oregon Attorney General Refuses to Defend State's Gay Marriage Ban
Christian Post ^ | 02/21/2014 | Michael Gryboski

Posted on 02/21/2014 9:03:10 AM PST by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last
To: Cheerio

RE: Why aren’t these elected bufoons thrown out of office or at a min impeached?

See Post #12 above.


21 posted on 02/21/2014 9:38:21 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The simple answer is none. The only way anything gets done in this country is through the dumbest of the Press. The Press has shown that it is totally corrupt, ignoring the things that place negative news on things they agree with and super hyping those things with which they agree. And, they agree with liberal philosophy and disagree with conservative philosophy. So, they will do nothing in this case. Should a conservative AG say he/she would not enforce an antigun law, you would hear about it, with complete negative spin, for weeks as the big story in the country.


22 posted on 02/21/2014 9:38:36 AM PST by falcon99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

It’s things like this in Oregon and Virgina that makes it so troublesome when some ridiculously blast the Convention of States movement, and put out the rationale that electing more republicans or using nullification will suffice.

In this case, it is Oregon’s leftists using nullification of a perfectly fine ballot measure.

Things NEED to shake up, and a COS is the way to do it.


23 posted on 02/21/2014 9:47:09 AM PST by C210N (When people fear government there is tyranny; when government fears people there is liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

You hit the point correct. Even in conservative circles the discussion on this issue is it is not a serious issue - politically conservative, not socially conservative circles of course.


24 posted on 02/21/2014 9:54:43 AM PST by gunsequalfreedom (Conservative is not a label of convenience. It is a guide to your actions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Tip of the iceberg here in Oregon. Governor khitzaber does exactly the same thing. Oregon is a mirror image of the corrupt lawless Obama administration.


25 posted on 02/21/2014 9:55:10 AM PST by Cold Heart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The people of the state should move to impeach her immediately. If they do not, they deserve what they get.


26 posted on 02/21/2014 10:09:27 AM PST by maxwellsmart_agent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fightin Whitey

And worse


27 posted on 02/21/2014 10:11:27 AM PST by Viennacon (M)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

By this example, shouldn’t the general public just disregard any law they believe unjust, so long as they can avoid being cited for a violation?


28 posted on 02/21/2014 10:42:58 AM PST by The_Media_never_lie (The media must be defeated any way it can be done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind; All
What law school did Oregon Attorney General get indoctrinated at?

As mentioned in related threads, the states have never amended the federal Constitution to expressly protect so-called gay rights. So the states are free to make laws which discriminate against gay issues imo, gay marriage in this example, as long as such laws don't also unreasonably abridge constitutionally enumerated rights.

What Ms Rosenblum actually needs to do is the following if she doesn't like Oregon's discriminatory constitutional amendment concerning gays. She needs to work with both state and federal lawmakers to propose a gay rights amendment to the federal Constitution to the states for ratification, and if the Article V supermajority states choose to ratify her proposed amendment, and I don't think that she's going to get the support as evidenced by her own state, then gay rights will be constitutionally protected and she will be a hero.

29 posted on 02/21/2014 10:43:12 AM PST by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

In America today, “he who keeps the law, is above the law”.


30 posted on 02/21/2014 10:44:44 AM PST by The_Media_never_lie (The media must be defeated any way it can be done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio
Brings back memories of CA and Prop 8. Why aren’t these elected bufoons thrown out of office or at a min impeached?

I would be surprised to learn that there are enough Oregonians willing to vote them out of office. A ballot measure that passed by 56% a decade ago would likely not pass today.
31 posted on 02/21/2014 11:08:26 AM PST by highball ("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Amendment10

RE: What law school did Oregon Attorney General get indoctrinated at?

From Wikipedia:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ellen_Rosenblum

She graduated from Evanston Township High School and attended Scripps College before earning her undergraduate degree from the University of Oregon in 1971, where she also earned a law degree in 1975.


32 posted on 02/21/2014 12:01:14 PM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum”

There’s that name “Ellen” again - the quintessential dyke name. (no offense to any conservative Ellen FReepers.)


33 posted on 02/21/2014 1:04:26 PM PST by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind; All
She graduated from Evanston Township High School and attended Scripps College before earning her undergraduate degree from the University of Oregon in 1971, where she also earned a law degree in 1975.

Thank you for noting that. Note that I ask the question where so-called constitutional law experts were educuted in a tongue-and-cheek way. Maybe I need to clarify that in my posts.

BTW, have you, or any freeper that you may know about, taken the online Hillsdale Constitution course. I'm reluctant to sign up because it may be a waste of time. After all, I read the Constitution-related posts in FR. :^)

34 posted on 02/21/2014 1:40:04 PM PST by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Amendment10

RE: BTW, have you, or any freeper that you may know about, taken the online Hillsdale Constitution course?

I have not but know of at least one conservative friend who has. He told me it was worth it. There’s really nothing to lose. It’s free.


35 posted on 02/21/2014 2:15:27 PM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I looked at the Oregonlive.com website and found the story there. It added that the federal judge ruling on the case is U.S. District Judge Michael McShane of Eugene. Eugene is not known as a hotbed of conservative values.


36 posted on 02/21/2014 3:00:11 PM PST by crazyhorse691 (Obama is just the symptom of what is destroying the U.S.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eyeamok

The Oregon bar is as sleazy and dishonest as she is.


37 posted on 02/25/2014 11:21:20 AM PST by rogator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson