I agree. However, the MSM conspires to hide a lot of it, while shining a bright light on the attitudes of Republicans.
I don't think that emphasizing Bill Clinton's sexual history is a winning tactic. However, I could be wrong; time will tell.
It is about exposing hypocrisy. Hillary was NOT in the dark as she pretends.
She said in 1992 that Gennifer Flowers was a fraud and that Hillary wasn’t some little woman standing by her cheatin’ man.
O really?
She is a thug. Even if the Lewinsky affair was consensual and without “coercion”, in the 60s, 70s, and 80s NOW said it was an abuse of power for a boss to hire a pretty secretary and take her willingly for overnight weekend trips for sexual encounters.
And there were plenty of allegations by women who were disgusted by his workplace harassment of them (at least one alleging rape).
This is why the whole issue of whether Bill was engaging in workplace affairs was germane to the Paula Jones’ lawsuit.
Bill Clinton was a sexual predator making unwelcome advances and used police intimidation to get his encounters and keep those who held information quiet.