Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Navy Wants Its Tomahawks to Bust More Bunkers
DefenseTech ^ | February 14, 2014 | Kris Osborn

Posted on 02/16/2014 11:44:00 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki

The Navy is working to make the Tomahawk missile a better bunker buster and allow it to distinguish targets on the move better.

U.S. Central Command recently sponsored development and testing of a new, more penetrating Tomahawk warhead called the Joint Multiple Effects Warhead System, or JMEWS, according to Capt. Joe Mauser, Tomahawk program manager.

Testing analyzed the ability of the programmable warhead to integrate onto the most advanced Block IV Tomahawk missile, a weapon which can loiter over targets, send back single frame images and change course in flight via a GPS guidance system.

The JMEWS would give the Tomahawk better bunker buster type effects — meaning it could enable the weapon to better penetrate hardened structures like concrete. Tomahawk missiles, first used in Operation Desert Storm in 1991, can reach subsonic speeds greater than 550 miles per hour, Navy officials said.

The missiles are a high-speed, low-altitude weapon designed to evade enemy air defenses – in part by flying lower to the ground and using precision GPS navigation systems.

U.S. and British commanders fired 221 Tomahawk missiles in 2011 from warships at the outset of the attack on Libya and Moammar Gadhafi. The missiles struck about 20 sites and helped destroy Libya’s air defense system.

Each warhead weighs about 3,500-pounds, costs about $569,000 and is 18-feet long with an 8-foot wingspan. Existing Tomahawk warheads include a 1,000-pound unitary warhead and submunitions dispenser variant carries which releases 166 combined-effects smaller bomblets, service officials said.

Meanwhile, Tomahawk prime contractor Raytheon, is working on a new seeker for the nose of the weapon that will allow it to better destroy moving targets and more effectively discriminate targets, said Jeff Meyer, a Raytheon official.

The new seeker involves using both an active and passive seeker on the front of the missile, he said.

“A passive system picks up the radar signature of a target and goes after it. Active is something you would use in the end game that would do target discrimination and make sure you don’t hit the wrong target,” Meyer explained.

A passive seeker would receive an electromagnetic signal and follow it, whereas an active seeker would also have the ability to send out or ping an electronic signal and bounce it off potential targets. Raytheon is planning additional testing for its new seeker system on the weapon, which would allow it to separate legitimate from false targets while on-the-move.

Read more: http://defensetech.org/2014/02/14/navy-wants-its-tomahawks-to-bust-more-bunkers/#ixzz2tZLJVcbg Defense.org


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aerospace; bunkerbuster; tomahawk; usn

1 posted on 02/16/2014 11:44:01 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ConorMacNessa

Navy Ping


2 posted on 02/16/2014 11:49:39 AM PST by SandRat (Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Each warhead weighs about 3,500-pounds, costs about $569,000 and is 18-feet long with an 8-foot wingspan.

Well that's will be a big warhead...gonna be a much bigger missile to carry that warhead. I'd say the author is likely confused with the actual weight and length of the current Tomahawks.

3 posted on 02/16/2014 12:02:02 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

$500,000 missile to destroy a two-man machine gun nest?


4 posted on 02/16/2014 12:44:19 PM PST by 2banana (My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2banana

$569K is just for the warhead, not the entire missile.


5 posted on 02/16/2014 2:17:58 PM PST by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 2banana

not a bad deal compared to the loss of an F18 and pilot to get the same machinegun nest


6 posted on 02/17/2014 4:16:30 AM PST by X Fretensis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson