[Hardastarboard]

We’re not allowed to question judges. They’re educated men, and know everything there is to know.

[xrmusn]

We’re not allowed to question judges. They’re educated men, and know everything there is to know
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
I just want to thank all my fellow Virginian Republicans(?) that opted to stay home because they didn’t like the haircuts of the R candidates or ‘wasted’ their vote on a Libertarian— that the ‘National Libertarians were saying WTF?’— and it turns out ‘backed’ by a Texas Liberal...

We lost the main seat by less than the ‘wasted’ votes and the AG by a handful (before the recount???)

Some saw McAwful may be HRC’s choice for VP (he was their ‘darling’ when wee willie was prez)but I believe us ‘R/Conservatives’ are going to pay dearly in the next couple of years....

[Ready4Freddy]

‘Educated’ at Kutztown State College and North Carolina Central College (an HBCU).

The same school that gave Crystal Mangum (of DukeLAX infamy) a degree.

[tanknetter]

We’re not allowed to question judges. They’re educated men, and know everything there is to know.

The fact that the judge doesn't know the difference between the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence is sad, troublesome even.

But the REAL problem is with this: While ever-vigilant for the wisdom that can come from the voices of our voting public ...

In saying that the judge nullifies the democratic and representative process. The courts' job as she sees it is just to be 'vigilant' for the "wisdom that can come" from THE PEOPLE.

Basically, from her perspective, little things like VOTING aren't so much directive decisions as "suggestions" that the courts can discard at their whim. Should they deem them of insufficient "wisdom."