Something I asked on another thread: Does that mean it is ok if the gay marriage issue is left to the states and so states like MA, NY and CA decide they are going to go ahead and have gay marriage while the states with traditional values decide to vote it down? I just want to know, would that be ok around here?
I mean, of course this is obscene and I would love to see Virginia be able to tell federal courts to just shove it, but if we were able to get that, would it be ok if this ideal scenario for VA and similar states also meant that states like NY or MA, that decide they do want gay marriage, would also have it? Or would that be considered unreasonable?
This Obama judge literally does not know the difference between the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence.
Why not the best?
No. The “Fundamental Transformation” isn’t complete yet. You’ll know when they’re done when you’re breaking your back in a rise paddy or rotting in a gulag.
We’re on the edge of economic, political, and social disaster. This is yet another sign.
These jduges are idiots as well as being un-American.
The plaintiffs in this case have the exact same rights to marry that I do. They can marry one person of the opposite sex that will have them.
They cannot marry their toaster, or their goat, or their mother nor another man. Same limitations I have.