This moron really means that!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
To: mandaladon
He’s not a moron, he’s a despot.
2 posted on
02/10/2014 3:06:02 PM PST by
fwdude
( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
To: mandaladon
Insanity strikes. Down with the King!!
To: mandaladon
4 posted on
02/10/2014 3:06:34 PM PST by
Libloather
(Embrace the suck)
To: mandaladon
Obama is mistaking himself for Reichskanzler.
6 posted on
02/10/2014 3:09:07 PM PST by
MeganC
(Support Matt Bevin to oust Mitch McConnell! https://mattbevin.com/)
To: mandaladon
And the "news" media have to check their cheat sheet:
Dem Prez - that's good.
Repub Prez - "imperial Presidency! Bad!"
7 posted on
02/10/2014 3:09:13 PM PST by
jeffc
(The U.S. media are our enemy)
To: mandaladon
Well, he has a point. He’s doing what he wants and no one stops him, so how is he wrong?
9 posted on
02/10/2014 3:09:28 PM PST by
OKSooner
("As the riders went on by him, he heard one call his name...")
To: mandaladon
King Louie of France thought that too.
12 posted on
02/10/2014 3:09:48 PM PST by
SandRat
(Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
To: mandaladon
They admired contraptions invented by Jefferson to read and write more efficiently such as a lectern and a "polygraph". After which the illegal, illicit, illegitmate squatter in our White House proclaimed, "Jefferson didn't really build those."
13 posted on
02/10/2014 3:09:52 PM PST by
workerbee
(The President of the United States is DOMESTIC ENEMY #1!)
To: mandaladon
Dictators say this kind of stuff all of the time.
14 posted on
02/10/2014 3:10:46 PM PST by
FlingWingFlyer
(ObamaCare. The "global warming" of healthcare plans.)
To: mandaladon
“...such as a lectern and a “polygraph”...”
Jefferson was so far ahead of his time. Of course now we don’t need it. Whenever Obama is behind a lectern he is always lieing.
17 posted on
02/10/2014 3:11:43 PM PST by
21twelve
(http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2185147/posts 2013 is 1933 REBORN)
To: mandaladon
Well with Republicans leaders like Boehner & Mcconnell Obama can do whatever he wants.
18 posted on
02/10/2014 3:11:56 PM PST by
RginTN
To: mandaladon
19 posted on
02/10/2014 3:14:47 PM PST by
Iron Munro
("Show me the man, and I'll show you the crime." - Lavrentiy Beria (& Eric Holder))
To: mandaladon
Correction, that c0@%sucker really means that!
20 posted on
02/10/2014 3:16:23 PM PST by
BatGuano
(You don't think I'd go into combat with loose change in my pocket, do ya?)
To: mandaladon
Ø must of been quite bored... what he really wanted to do was rummage the WH for a bust of Jefferson to send back to France.
21 posted on
02/10/2014 3:18:02 PM PST by
C210N
(When people fear government there is tyranny; when government fears people there is liberty)
To: mandaladon
22 posted on
02/10/2014 3:20:02 PM PST by
The Mayor
(Honesty means never having to look over your shoulder.)
To: mandaladon
To: mandaladon
Got news for you, Skippy.....you are NOT above the Law. Sooner or later this REALITY is going to slap you right upside your noggin.
Count on it.
24 posted on
02/10/2014 3:21:24 PM PST by
Howie66
(Molon Labe, Traitors!)
To: All
HE DON'T KNOW NUTTIN' Holder can't explain constitutional basis for Obama's executive orders Washington Examiner | JAN 29, 2014 | by Joel Gehrke / FR Posted by Texas Fossil
Attorney General Eric Holder couldn't explain to a Congressional Committee the constitutional basis for executive orders such as President Obama's delay of the employer mandate because he hasn't read the legal analysis -- or at least, hasn't seen it in a long time.
"I'll be honest with you, I have not seen -- I don't remember looking at or having seen the analysis in some time, so I'm not sure where along the spectrum that would come," Holder replied to Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, when Lee asked him to explain the nature of Obama's constitutional power to delay the mandate.
Sen Lee had based his question on a standard legal test, first described by US Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson, who said the president's authority to issue executive orders is strongest when he does so with the backing of Congress (category one), more dubious when he issues an order pertaining to a topic on which Congress has not passed a law (category two), and weakest when the executive order is "incompatible with a congressional command" (category three), to use Lee's paraphrase.....more at washingtonexaminer.com ...
25 posted on
02/10/2014 3:23:10 PM PST by
Liz
To: mandaladon
Constitutional professor my @$$! (yes I know he only played one)
26 posted on
02/10/2014 3:23:56 PM PST by
Mastador1
(I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
To: mandaladon
>> POTUS and president Hollande walked out from a portico
A single dark cumulonimbus cloud suddenly appears over Charlottesville, pregnant with static electrical charge. Coincidentally, a pair of communists emerge from cover out into the open...
Could’ve been a two-fer for the ages. “Nice aim, LORD!”
Oh well, GOD has a plan and I guess that wasn’t it. ;-)
27 posted on
02/10/2014 3:24:37 PM PST by
Nervous Tick
(Without GOD, men get what they deserve.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson