Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: James C. Bennett
Statistics for Dummies: note the word "involved" - in a multiple car accident it means all regardless of who caused the accident. The next line has "Drugged driving" suggesting that the one causing the accident was "drugged" while it may be the one not drugged caused the crash. Yet the accident involved a "drugged person". Clever.

Further, pot is fat-soluble and is detectable in the blood for months when using mass-spectroscopy. There is no clear blood-pot-level for impairment as there is with ethanol. So the odds of finding some level of pot despite the length of time since used is greater than for similar ethanol use.

I'd rather be on a drug-free highway but if I had my choice I would pick the slow-driving potheads than the reckless boozehounds.

9 posted on 02/07/2014 4:06:00 AM PST by corkoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: corkoman

Statistics for Dummies: note the word “involved” - in a multiple car accident it means all regardless of who caused the accident.


Indeed. It also include accidents where a passenger is stoned, even if the driver was sober. It even includes stoned (or drunk) pedestrians who get mowed down by a sober driver while trying to cross a highway.


31 posted on 02/07/2014 5:55:27 AM PST by Atlas Sneezed ("Income Inequality?" Let's start with Washington DC vs. the rest of the nation!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson