Oddly, most creationists and intelligent design proponents who saw the debate thought Bill Nye had the upper hand in the end.
Ken Ham ( probably because of time limitations ) did not address many of the points brought up by Nye.
I beg to differ, he countered many. Not all, but many.
In the same way, Bill Nye( probably because of time limitations ) did not address many of the points brought up by Ham.
I believe in ID, but don’t necessarily buy into all that Ham says.
That being said, I think Ham DID make a good case for creation being a worthwhile model.
Nye also did a good job for his side.
I had to quit watching after a couple of the Q&A questions...had to go to bed. But I got the feeling it was a draw; most of the time I watch those thinking the ID proponent won.
Or perhaps because he can't?
Nye didn’t address a lot of Ham’s questions either.