Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: celmak

Oddly, most creationists and intelligent design proponents who saw the debate thought Bill Nye had the upper hand in the end.

Ken Ham ( probably because of time limitations ) did not address many of the points brought up by Nye.


6 posted on 02/06/2014 2:04:44 PM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SeekAndFind

I beg to differ, he countered many. Not all, but many.


9 posted on 02/06/2014 2:06:07 PM PST by celmak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

In the same way, Bill Nye( probably because of time limitations ) did not address many of the points brought up by Ham.


13 posted on 02/06/2014 2:10:49 PM PST by celmak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

I believe in ID, but don’t necessarily buy into all that Ham says.

That being said, I think Ham DID make a good case for creation being a worthwhile model.

Nye also did a good job for his side.

I had to quit watching after a couple of the Q&A questions...had to go to bed. But I got the feeling it was a draw; most of the time I watch those thinking the ID proponent won.


24 posted on 02/06/2014 2:29:18 PM PST by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
Ken Ham ( probably because of time limitations ) did not address many of the points brought up by Nye.

Or perhaps because he can't?

47 posted on 02/06/2014 3:22:18 PM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Nye didn’t address a lot of Ham’s questions either.


53 posted on 02/06/2014 3:30:18 PM PST by ealgeone (obama, border)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson