Other than the wise crack directed at me, you didn’t say anything.
Naturally, with the way the Catholic leaders designed their denomination’s leadership and institution, it is going to always be appealing to homosexual men, the homosexual element will always be there, it will surge to the surface, and then be dampened, repeatedly.
All Catholic Priests vow celibacy, so forbidding homosexuals to be a part of the single men who make up the entirety of the global church leadership, doesn’t seem to be an option.
Homosexuals have always tried to get into the clergy. We know this from the writings of the early Church Fathers and from medieval schoolmen and abbots. But they can't succeed in any significant numbers if the rules are followed.
If one sneaks into seminary, he won't last long if the rules are followed. A homosexual man can't live in close proximity to a bunch of other young men without being found out (that is the charitable reason for barring them from the priesthood - their situation is a near occasion of sin for them. Like putting a young college man in charge of a sorority house.)
We had a number of bishops who worshiped the Spirit of the Age instead of following the established law of Christ's Church. That resulted in homosexuals not only in the clergy but in the chancery and in seminaries - along with a gaggle of man-hating female fellow-travellers. Thankfully they are on their way out, but they have done a lot of damage, not the least of which is causing many people to believe the celibate model is a failure.
Sorry you see a mild jest as directed at you personally. It wasn't.