Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/31/2014 3:35:36 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: nickcarraway
The State Department today released its long-awaited environmental impact analysis

OK, for ten points, boys and girls, what's wrong with this picture?

2 posted on 01/31/2014 3:37:54 PM PST by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
Obama will find a reason to delay it or not build it at all. The socialist left does not want energy independence if it involves US/Canadian produced oil. Our president would much rather support his fellow islamics by buying the oil from them at inflamed and controlled prices.
3 posted on 01/31/2014 3:39:47 PM PST by oldenuff2no
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

It must NOT be built because it will cause a decrease in food stamps and unemployment. Those must be preserved at all costs to ensure the sheeple are kept subservient to the messyiah.


4 posted on 01/31/2014 3:40:07 PM PST by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Building a movement by misleading people is a strange choice.

It is the key choice of Leftists. It is their main strategy. The entire “progressive movement is built on this idea. If they did not have to mislead people, democracy would work, the Constitution would not have to be torn down, and the idea that we would need experts to make every decision for us would not be required.

However, if people are too stupid and ignorant to make their own decisions, then you *must* mislead them.


5 posted on 01/31/2014 3:40:57 PM PST by marktwain (The old media must die for the Republic to live. Long live the new media!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
Will not be built while King Obama is on the throne.
8 posted on 01/31/2014 3:49:16 PM PST by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Obama will finally approve this like he’s doing us a big favor....It should have been approved years ago.


10 posted on 01/31/2014 3:53:07 PM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
His analysis was based on a simple back-of-the-envelope calculation that turned out to be wrong in several respects, the most important being the assumption that blocking the pipeline would keep the oil in the Canadian oil sands in the ground.

Anybody with an ant's brain knew the pipeline was going to be built; it was either going west or south, but in no reality was that oil just going to stay in the ground.

11 posted on 01/31/2014 3:54:06 PM PST by henkster (Communists never negotiate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway; potlatch; PhilDragoo

Warren Buffet owns the trains and is a contributor. Reason enough for the delay.


12 posted on 01/31/2014 4:06:21 PM PST by ntnychik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
An unusual situation - Jonathan Chait making sense.

Building a movement by misleading people is a strange choice.

And yet Chait seems incapable of grasping the fact that building a movement by misleading people is the essence of how today's Democrat Party works.

The false choice, the misleading straw-man argument, and the big lie are all hallmarks of 'the Obama way' and the Democrat talking points that parrot his words.

Exactly what is so hard about that for Chait to grasp?

15 posted on 01/31/2014 4:18:58 PM PST by Zeppo ("Happy Pony is on - and I'm NOT missing Happy Pony")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Are united states suppliers able to add their oil/gas to the pipeline? is this just a straight canada to us port for export passthrough?


16 posted on 01/31/2014 4:20:54 PM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
GET

ON

WITH

IT.

17 posted on 01/31/2014 4:34:26 PM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

19 posted on 01/31/2014 5:05:27 PM PST by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
if we block the pipeline, Canada will just ship the oil out by rail.

And that oil will be replaced, as it presently is, by oil brought in by ship. If environmental concerns matter at all, replacing the parade of tanker ships crossing the high seas full of oil would be a high priority.

But since environmentalists and a goodly number of our politicians are OPEC flacks, it is the reverse. Protecting that parade of ships from a competing pipeline becomes job one.

25 posted on 01/31/2014 7:46:33 PM PST by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

NIMBYs are concerned about their “property values,” and few local, yocal oil-connected businesses in the U.S.A don’t want the extra competition. But if the pipeline goes through, your fuel prices will go down.


26 posted on 01/31/2014 7:47:35 PM PST by familyop (We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of corruption smelled around the planet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson