Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DuncanWaring
The thread that had the expert is from earlier last year and it will be a chore for me to find it but I may have bookmarked it. It was quite detailed. It was evident that the writer had the facts and experience.

Here's a wikipedia link on it:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smokeless_powder

Military commanders had been complaining since the Napoleonic Wars about the problems of giving orders on a battlefield obscured by the smoke of firing. Verbal commands could not be heard above the noise of the guns, and visual signals could not be seen through the thick smoke from the gunpowder used by the guns. Unless there was a strong wind, after a few shots, soldiers using black powder ammunition would have their view obscured by a huge cloud of smoke. Snipers or other concealed shooters were given away by a cloud of smoke over the firing position. Black powder is also corrosive, making cleaning mandatory after every use. Likewise, black powder's tendency to produce severe fouling caused actions to jam and often made reloading difficult.

Here's a youtube video that explains and shows why it's important:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yceuluh_pJE

94 posted on 01/31/2014 10:23:22 AM PST by Hostage (ARTICLE V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]


To: Hostage

That’s “smokeless powder”, not “smokeless black powder”.

There’s “smokeless powder”, and “black powder”, but no such thing as “smokeless black powder” (to the best of my knowledge).

Yes, the supply of smokeless powder has been intermittent for about five years now.


98 posted on 01/31/2014 10:53:20 AM PST by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson