Posted on 01/27/2014 4:26:22 AM PST by Kaslin
Uh ... they can’t reproduce without outside help ... they have no say in this.
They’ve got as much right to speak as I or any other man. It doesn’t make them right but it does once again prove the hypocrisy of the left.
Just the other day on FOX Andrea Tantaros declared that men have no right to speak on birth control or abortion because they’re private matters and men need to shut up about them.
I’ve got a bunch of problems with that crap. Right off the top is the 1st amendment which doesn’t mention that I don’t have a right to speak on specific issues. As far as them being private matters, they stopped being private when taxpayers were forced to pay for them. Until women can produce children with zero input from men, I have just as many “reproductive rights” as any woman.
Its been a very effective tactic for the left because it immediately eliminates half the population from the discussion. They don’t stop there and then declare it off limits for various segments of the female population as well.
So remember ladies, whether I wear a condom or have had a vasectomy is none of your damn business. For that matter, if you want to find out if I’m the father of your child, maybe my genetic material is off limits to your test.
OK so we discover there is a Homosexual gene and that gene could be discovered long before birth and people started aborting those with the gay gene, I wonder how they would think about it then.
Bingo!!!!
So homosexuals who through their chosen life style can’t reproduce with natural means, want to murder the babies they produce with turkey basters?
Really? If they ever find a gene that predisposes one to homosexuality, we’ll see how keen this group is on letting women dispose of such “fetuses.”
It is quite meaningful that homosexual advocacy and abortion advocacy are so closely linked.
However, it requires a deep understanding to see the connection, one that most people see as a contradiction.
-——homosexual advocacy and abortion advocacy are so closely linked-——
It will be hard times for queers when the queer gene can be detected in an unborn child that will be instantly aborted.
That's okay. I don't need a test to know who the father of my children is (it's not you).
;)
What we are hearing is a handful of loudmouths who presume to speak for the entire “gay” community.
And we’re seeing a “gay” community that (by its own nature) is so weak it will let itself be led around by the nose.
Sheep currently looking to the wrong shepherd. Maybe this is part of a divine plan to bring them into situations so absurd that even they will know this road needs to be abandoned.
I can’t remember who said it, but that gays would only become pro-life if people started aborting babies after a genetic test said they’d be homosexual, the way we are nearly wiping out Down Syndrome babies after genetic testing.
But they’d lose the argument, if you can kill the baby for any reason, why not for a genetic defect like all the others we terminate for?
When the gay gene is detectable by amniocentesis, the gay activists will be fire-bombing abortion clinics.
... I mean, if I were a “gay” and I had half a scruple I’d begin thinking about rebelling at this point. “Gays” with ethics? What? Is this a contradiction in terms? Well no, surprisingly it isn’t. If you read some of their actual discussions, sure they like their sin, but they are conflicted with wishes for the well being of society and family and friends. In the long term, of course, the sin will undermine those. And these ghastly new leaders will bring the issue to a head quicker.
God is in operation, and it isn’t just to smack an indiscriminate hammer down on the whole scene. Pressure is being applied which will (to take another metaphor) eventually pop the spiritual zit here. I believe that is what the Great Physician is up to. Hoot at me if you want. But I look for silver linings in clouds.
If such a thing could be identified.
I kind of doubt that it could. I think with enough applied research, sets of genes that would increase the likelihood of falling into that sin might be found, but we would likely also find those same genes represent a temperament of child that is a greater challenge to raise. A child that is more sensitive and that has greater spiritual capacity than most, and when frustrated he (or she) seeks satisfaction in “idols” which the devil opportunistically presents. Raising the spiritual awareness of society in general will head off a lot of these tragedies (which God can still remedy, although in later life).
I saw that. I don't think she said they have no right. I think she was saying that it is a very bad strategy for a Republican male in an upcoming election debate, since the left will perceive it as the "oppressive white male theocrat" theme and make a big stink in the media when men talk about women's birth control. She could have explained it better.
She can explain it any way she wants, she can still kiss my ass.
Want to stop the ending liberalism at universities like UNC-Wilmington? Simple, STOP FUNDING.
Stay classy, there, cripple creek.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.