Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tacticalogic

Yes.

In fairness, often there is no top or bottom bracketing volcanic ash or other igneous rock to where you find a fossil, so you can be in a situation where you can say “it’s no older than X” or “not younger than Y” or have a situation where you have no bracketing igneous rock, but some sort of wide spread fossil that appears for a short time that is well-bracketed and you base the age on the previously-determined age of the other fossils.

In that circumstance, the circle is kind of correct, but omits the fact that the age of fossil was determined somewhere else.


56 posted on 01/24/2014 1:03:43 PM PST by Jewbacca (The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]


To: Jewbacca
the circle is kind of correct, but omits the fact that the age of fossil was determined somewhere else.

Half-truths are the most seductive kind of lies.

62 posted on 01/24/2014 1:29:20 PM PST by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson