Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gregory Hicks: Benghazi and the Smearing of Chris Stevens
Wall Street Journal ^ | Jan. 22, 2014 7:18 p.m. ET | Gregory Hicks

Posted on 01/24/2014 8:03:41 AM PST by Republicanprofessor

Last week the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence issued its report on the Sept. 11, 2012, terrorist attacks in Benghazi, Libya. The report concluded that the attack, which resulted in the murder of four Americans, was "preventable." Some have been suggesting that the blame for this tragedy lies at least partly with Ambassador Chris Stevens, who was killed in the attack. This is untrue: The blame lies entirely with Washington.

The report states that retired Gen. Carter Ham, then-commander of the U.S. Africa Command (Africom) headquartered in Stuttgart, Germany, twice offered to "sustain" the special forces security team in Tripoli and that Chris twice "declined." Since Chris cannot speak, I want to explain the reasons and timing for his responses to Gen. Ham. As the deputy chief of mission, I was kept informed by Chris or was present throughout the process.....

Chris described an incident in Pakistan in 2011 when an American security contractor killed Pakistani citizens in self-defense, precipitating a crisis in U.S.-Pakistani relations. He also pointed out that four International Criminal Court staff, who had traveled to Libya in June 2012 to interview Gadhafi's oldest son, Saif al-Islam al-Qadhafi, were illegally detained by tribal authorities under suspicion of spying. This was another risk U.S. military personnel might face.

During that video conference, Chris stressed that the only way to mitigate the risk was to ensure that U.S. military personnel serving in Libya would have diplomatic immunity, which should be done prior to any change of authority.

Chris understood the importance of the special forces team to the security of our embassy personnel. He believed that by explaining his concerns, the Defense Department would postpone the decision so he could have time to work with the Libyan government and get diplomatic immunity for the special forces.

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: benghazi; benghazigate; benghzicoverup; carterham; chrisstevens; nohonesty; nointegrity; notransparency; senatecoverup
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last
To: Republicanprofessor

bkmk


21 posted on 01/25/2014 12:15:05 PM PST by AllAmericanGirl44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: livius
Accd. to the source doc at the WSJ the idea was as you say to get them all diplomatic immunity to avoid disasters that had happening around the Mideast with security being accused of being spies and the like.

Steven appears to have been traveling down the correct path on security but it appears he was sabotaged with the clip below stating he had 30 people and that was cut to 9 by state and defense.

You just gotta wonder about the timing to cut his security to nine when all the other countries embassies and other places in Benghazi were being attacked routinely and the annex/ambassadeurs headquarters appeared to be next. Makes no sense unless Stevens was a target.

Rumors are he knew too much and was lax in keeping everything secret. In the most secretive adm. ever that will get you killed apparently.

http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304302704579332732276330284?mg=reno64-wsj&url=http%3A%2F%2Fonline.wsj.com%2Farticle%2FSB10001424052702304302704579332732276330284.html

Because Mr. Kennedy had refused to extend the special forces security mission, State Department protocol required Chris to decline Gen. Ham's two offers to do so, which were made after Aug. 6. I have found the reporting of these so-called offers strange, since my recollection of events is that after the Aug. 6 incident, Gen. Ham wanted to withdraw the entire special forces team from Tripoli until they had Libyan government approval of their new mission and the diplomatic immunity necessary to perform their mission safely. However, Chris convinced Gen. Ham to leave six members of the team in Tripoli. When I arrived in Tripoli on July 31, we had over 30 security personnel, from the State Department and the U.S. military, assigned to protect the diplomatic mission to Libya. All were under the ambassador's authority. On Sept. 11, we had only nine diplomatic security agents under Chris's authority to protect our diplomatic personnel in Tripoli and Benghazi. I was interviewed by the Select Committee and its staff, who were professional and thorough. I explained this sequence of events. For some reason, my explanation did not make it into the Senate report. To sum up: Chris Stevens was not responsible for the reduction in security personnel. His requests for additional security were denied or ignored. Officials at the State and Defense Departments in Washington made the decisions that resulted in reduced security. Sen. Lindsey Graham stated on the Senate floor last week that Chris “was in Benghazi because that is where he was supposed to be doing what America wanted him to do: Try to hold Libya together.” He added, “Quit blaming the dead guy.”

Mr. Hicks served as Deputy Chief of Mission at the U.S. Embassy in Tripoli from July 31

22 posted on 01/25/2014 1:00:15 PM PST by rodguy911 (FreeRepublic:Land of the Free because of the Brave--Sarah Palin our secret weapon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: gandalftb
Wow great post! All of which makes perfect sense.
I had heard that Stevens had converted and was a muslim.I also had read that he had a very high opinion of the locals which seemed extremely naive to me since they appeared to be loyal only to the highest bidder, IMHO.Just parroting what I have read.
23 posted on 01/25/2014 1:04:54 PM PST by rodguy911 (FreeRepublic:Land of the Free because of the Brave--Sarah Palin our secret weapon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson