Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CMailBag

Question: was there some kind of bad blood between Herself, the Cold & Joyless? That would explain “allowing” Ambassador Stevens to be in a high-risk locality, and then withdrawing any kind of security or extraction support.

It is not beyond the scope of Madame Benghazi to use such extremes to “nullify” an inconvenient person, remember Vince Foster or Jim McDougal. To all that may be learned of Chris Stevens’ personal philosophy, he was not generally in great disagreement with Herself, but he may have known something that reflected poorly on either the performance in office or of entanglements in what would be treasonous activity.

What difference, at this point, does it make?


10 posted on 01/23/2014 1:18:25 PM PST by alloysteel (Obamacare - Death and Taxes now available online. One-stop shopping at its best!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: alloysteel
How about that he knew of the arming of Egyptian Terrorists thru Syria. Something Nero wanted and Queen Hillary designed.

They figured Chris would talk if put under pressure so he became expendable when the mission went sideways.

If you saw the Movie, "Shooter" it's just like that. Once the clandestine mission is compromised, close up shop, deny any involvement and let those on the front line fend for themselves and/or die.

You've got to remember, these pukes making the decisions don't think like Patriots. They would never think that someone would come to the aid of the Ambassador or others in that compound, because if it were them they would have been on a plane after the first round was fired. Hitlary and Kennedy both know of security risks that is why Hitlary had a forward team come in before her visit in that part of the word.

15 posted on 01/23/2014 1:47:57 PM PST by VRWCarea51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: alloysteel

Hillary was completely out of the loop and did whatever The Won told her to do. The fact that she seems to have had a lost weekend while all this was going on is proof of this. I don’t think she cared about Stevens or any of them one way or another, because all she has ever cared about is herself and what will promote her to another level. But she doesn’t want to work at it or oppose anyone, because for some reason, she feels it’s her right.

She was completely ineffective as SOS. All she ever did in the WH when her husband was President was stand by her man, whether it meant hiding or finding things (Rose firm billings) or just standing at his side smiling blandly. And that’s all she did as SOS for Obama, when Obama was her “man.”

Hillary was useless and I think she wants us to forget she was ever SOS.


20 posted on 01/23/2014 3:02:21 PM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson