Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Repeal The 17th

-
http://www.supremecourt.gov/qp/12-01493qp.pdf
-
12-1493 ABRAMSKI V. UNITED STATES
DECISION BELOW: 706 F.3d 307
LOWER COURT CASE NUMBER: 11-4992

QUESTION PRESENTED:
When a person buys a gun intending to later sell it to someone else,
the government often prosecutes the initial buyer under 18 U.S.C. § 922(a)(6)
for making a false statement about the identity of the buyer that is
“material to the lawfulness of the sale.”
These prosecutions rely on the court-created “straw purchaser” doctrine,
a legal fiction that treats the ultimate recipient of a firearm as the
“actual buyer,” and the immediate purchaser as a mere “straw man.”

The lower courts uniformly agree that a buyer’s intent to resell a gun
to someone who cannot lawfully buy it is a fact
“material to the lawfulness of the sale.”
But the Fourth, Sixth, and Eleventh Circuits
have split with the Fifth and Ninth Circuits
about whether the same is true when the ultimate recipient
can lawfully buy a gun.

The questions presented are:
1. Is a gun buyer’s intent to sell a firearm
to another lawful buyer in the future a fact
“material to the lawfulness of the sale”
of the firearm under 18 U.S.C. § 922(a)(6)?

2. Is a gun buyer’s intent to sell a firearm
to another lawful buyer in the future a piece of information
“required ... to be kept” by a federally licensed firearm dealer
under § 924(a)(I)(A)?

CERT. GRANTED 10/15/2013


24 posted on 01/22/2014 5:19:36 PM PST by Repeal The 17th (We have met the enemy and he is us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Repeal The 17th

>>When a person buys a gun intending to later sell it to someone else,
the government often prosecutes the initial buyer under 18 U.S.C. § 922(a)(6)
for making a false statement about the identity of the buyer that is
“material to the lawfulness of the sale.”<<

Right here is the reason you should never buy firearms from dealers. Always buy from private parties!


30 posted on 01/22/2014 5:30:33 PM PST by B4Ranch (Name your illness, do a Google & YouTube search with "hydrogen peroxide". Do it and be surprised.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: Repeal The 17th

“buyer’s intent to resell a gun”

Guns, being the most durable of goods in our society, may very well be purchased with the intent to sell some years or decades hence. In fact, the imputation may be made that ALL gun purchases are done with “intent to resell” (if for $0), as short of extreme cases the gun WILL outlast the owner. The question, as asked, places no upper limit on the timeframe of “intent”.


64 posted on 01/22/2014 8:16:04 PM PST by ctdonath2 (Making good people helpless doesn't make bad people harmless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: Repeal The 17th

So... who goes to jail for running guns under Fast and Furious?


73 posted on 01/22/2014 10:03:14 PM PST by Rodamala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson