Posted on 01/22/2014 8:15:06 AM PST by PreciousLiberty
Unlike the author of this article, I was actually alive in 2010.
I know. Incredible. So old.
I remember that summer being a rather normal summer. HOWEVER, this past summer was crazy mild/cold.
“NOAA arbitrarily adjusted past temperatures downward”
Do you have a link to information on that?
No one who is even close to being sane would take seriously someone who claims to be able to measure the average temperature of the entire Earth over a twelve month period to an accuracy of 1/100 of one degree. The idea of such accuracy is in and of itself evidence of madness.
Yeah.
Cold kills. Heat is just an inconvenience.
I always ask a global warming disciple: Is it colder at night? Why is that?
It takes some real gall to totally ignore the climatic effects of a gigantic fireball that you can witness with your own eyes for about half of a normal day.
1. Proof of chain-of-custody of all numbers from each sensor to presented documents.
2. Proof of chain-of-custody of all sensor calibration documents.
3. Proof of infallable integrity of all sensors readers as not holding any political agenda.
4. Proof every sensor is properly positioned in geography away from affecting manmade or natural structures. Chain of custody of those documents as well.
5. The burden of proof is on the instigator. Until all above documents are presented, all numbers used in all charts, graphs, speadsheets are invalid.
Wiki-Input:
In Confessions of a Confidence Man, Edward H. Smith lists the “six definite steps or stages of growth in every finely balanced and well-conceived confidence game.”
“One follows the other with absolute precision. In some games one or more of these acts, to use a theatrical comparison, may be dropped out, but where that happens the game is not a model one. The reference to the stage is apt, for the fine con game has its introduction, development, climax, dénouement and close, just like any good play. And this is not the only analogy to the drama, for the scenes are often as carefully set; the background is always a vital factor. In the colorful and mirthful language of the bunko man, all these parts of the game have their special names. I give them with their definitions:
(i) Foundation Work
The preparations which are made before the scheme is put in motion, including the elaboration of the plan, the employment of assistants and so forth.
(ii) Approach
The manner of getting in touch with the victimoften most elaborately and carefully prepared.
(iii) Build-up
Rousing and sustaining the interest of the victim, introducing the scheme to him, rousing his greed, showing him the chance of profit and filling him with so much anticipation and cupidity that his judgment is warped and his caution thrown away.
(iv)Pay-off or Convincer
An actual or apparent paying of money by the conspirators to convince the victim and settle doubts by a cash demonstration. In the old banco game the initial small bets which the victim was allowed to win were the pay-off. In stock swindles the fake dividends sent to stockholders to encourage larger investments are the pay-off.
(v)The Hurrah
This is like the dénouement in a play and no con scheme is complete without it. It is a sudden crisis or unexpected development by which the sucker is pushed over the last doubt or obstacle and forced to act. Once the hurrah is sprung the victim is clay in the schemers hands or there is no game.
(vi)The In-and-In
This is the point in a con game where the conspirator puts some of his money into the deal with that of the victim; first, to remove the last doubt that may tarry in the gulls mind, and, second, to put the con man in control of the situation after the deal is completed, thus forestalling a squeal. Often the whole game is built up around this feature and just as often it does not figure at all.
In addition, some games require what is called ‘corroboration’, which means what it says. This is important in games where a banker or other shrewd customer is to be the victim.”[4]
Youre not playing right.
Well, it would have been the beginning of man, geeze. I mean if you have to ask...
This is a scientific report, you think they have time to stop and put parameters in there?
Like 5,000 BC, something like that.
I told the cashier at whole foods yesterday I didnt bring my bags they’d have to give me paper bags.
She said, oh no! Like I was piloting the enola gay and was about to be responsible for mass destruction. Worse than 10 Saudis on three loaded flights
Now, how are these people supposed to be able to scold me in front of my kids if these reports come out with real numbers?
Until they can answer that question, they should not be listened to when they spout alarmist crap.
And, since they will never be able to answer that question, they should never be listened to when spouting alarmist crap.
Freighter and a tug pushing through ice on green bay on the 5th.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4roO5eTu6hY
Did the records come form Boulder Colorado? With the new drug laws in Colorado it makes anything form Boulder totally suspect.
Comes from plugging-in the 40th variable of some wunderkind’s equation.
Overall global temps are at an all time low.
Just another wealth redistribution scam.
Check out the graph in post 2: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2429917/posts
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.