1 posted on
01/14/2014 10:08:43 AM PST by
QT3.14
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-38 last
To: QT3.14
Hey, I’ve got a question about Hillary - not related to this but I don’t want to post a vanity.
I see ads for the new “I’m Ready for Hillary PAC” - or whatever it is called.
Whose PAC is it? Who’s raising the money? Her, someone else? She’s not a candidate now, so what happens to the money if she doesn’t run?
Could I start a PAC “so and so for president” and keep any donations I might collect? Would you need that person’s permission to raise money on their name? Are you restricted in what you can spend the money on?
Could Lois Lerner fill me in, you think?
30 posted on
01/14/2014 10:45:57 AM PST by
jocon307
To: QT3.14
33 posted on
01/14/2014 10:53:15 AM PST by
bigbob
(The best way to get a bad law repealed is to enforce it strictly. Abraham Lincoln)
To: QT3.14
It really doesn’t matter.
Democrats will STILL vote for her over the ‘evil’ Republican, whoever it is, that she’ll run against.
It just doesn’t matter at all to them.
To: QT3.14
That was then this is now. Those things now earn you medals in the Demonrat party. Nothing to see, move along.
36 posted on
01/14/2014 10:56:07 AM PST by
bjorn14
(Woe to those who call good evil and evil good. Isaiah 5:20)
To: QT3.14
He must be #1 on her hit list!
37 posted on
01/14/2014 10:56:45 AM PST by
FES0844
To: QT3.14
Stay out of any local parks my friend.
To: QT3.14
thanks, for the informational ping/post. 
41 posted on
01/14/2014 11:16:15 AM PST by
skinkinthegrass
(The end move in politics is always to pick up a gun..0'Caligula / 0'Reid / 0'Pelosi :-)
To: QT3.14
Oh sh*t. Bill told me he burned those records.
42 posted on
01/14/2014 11:18:33 AM PST by
McGruff
(I stand with Phil.)
To: QT3.14; Yo-Yo
Tramples on the Constitution?
What differance does it make!!!??!
43 posted on
01/14/2014 11:19:00 AM PST by
KC_Lion
(Build the America you want to live in at your address, and keep looking up.- Sarah Palin)
To: QT3.14
Gee, after obozo, sounds to me that she has ALL the RIGHT STUFF!
45 posted on
01/14/2014 11:24:40 AM PST by
Dick Bachert
(Ignorance is NOT BLISS. It is the ROAD TO SERFDOM! We're on a ROAD TRIP!!)
To: QT3.14
She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality. Yes, but it was all for the greater good. /s
47 posted on
01/14/2014 11:30:16 AM PST by
Mr. Jeeves
(CTRL-GALT-DELETE)
To: QT3.14
Is there some official record somewhere regarding this?
Would be good if there was.
48 posted on
01/14/2014 11:32:17 AM PST by
A CA Guy
( God Bless America, God Bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
To: QT3.14
Sounds like Democrat presidential material.
To: QT3.14
Even the libs thought she was bad.
51 posted on
01/14/2014 11:38:14 AM PST by
freekitty
(Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
To: QT3.14
57 posted on
01/14/2014 12:05:33 PM PST by
shortstop
(It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful)
To: QT3.14
She is a democrat. Lying is a resume enhancement.
To: QT3.14
MSM is nor interested in this.
64 posted on
01/14/2014 1:42:36 PM PST by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
To: QT3.14
Isn’t unethical, dishonest lawyer all redundant?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-38 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
