Ruling says they can, not that they have to.
Doctors can perform abortions, or choose not to.
Also the distinction between the physician doing the killing (ie pushing a bolus of morphine or potassium) versus giving the patient the means to do it themselves. Latter happens regularly. Any diabetic can inject themselves with an entire vial of insulin and kill themselves. Or ingest their one month supply of pain meds with the same result. Is then the prescribing of these meds ‘assisted suicide’?
I never accept the taking of life, self or otherwise.
To many great reasons not to do so.
Ruling says they can, not that they have to.
Doctors can perform abortions, or choose not to.
^ This is a KEY distinction.
Were the ruling “you have to”, I would be screaming bloody murder. All this ruling means is that doctors cannot be hauled off like Democrat-voting, welfare-mooching street pharmacists for giving a terminally ill patient enough morphine to not go through agony we wouldn’t let a PET go through.