Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

How many people know that one of the leaders of the terrorist organization that perpetrated the attack and murder of our ambassador in Benghazi was a prisoner at Gitmo who was freed?

Read more here:

State Department designates 3 Ansar al Sharia organizations, leaders as terrorist organizations

Another "must read" and "must bookmark" article.

1 posted on 01/11/2014 7:24:36 PM PST by Innovative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: Innovative

Thanks for posting this informative article. The author left out Code Pink, which works with Obama and terrorists against the U.S. But otherwise it is good to see this at Fox.


38 posted on 01/12/2014 7:56:35 AM PST by kristinn (Welcome to the Soviet States of Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative
Regrettably, it’s a coalition President Barack Obama has sided with in his priority to release as many Al Qaeda, Taliban and “affiliates” as humanly possible.

It's his #1 Agenda. Don't forget: The very first day he took office Jan. 20th 2009, the very first thing he did was try to close Gitmo. Above ALL else, terrorists were his #1 priority the second he took office.

41 posted on 01/12/2014 9:26:22 AM PST by GrandJediMasterYoda (Hitlery: Incarnation of evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

I read and read and read all this madness and lately all it’s done is gotten me through whatever stages in between and straight to pissed off. I write and write and write but writing to my congressman a progressive commie is like hitting a brick wall, he could give a hoot.


42 posted on 01/12/2014 10:33:52 AM PST by Karliner ( Jeremiah 29:11, Romans 8:28- 8:38"...this is the end of the beginning."WC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

I just read large portions of “Company Man” by John Rizzo.

He was a long-time CIA man and head of it’s legal team during a goo part of the GWBUsh Admin.

According to Rizzo Rumsfield kept his distance from the “secret” CIA detention program and was also NOT keen on GITMO either; he just didn’t want the headache in DOD’s lap. Not that he didn’t go along with it, as a loyal Sec of Def, but, according to Rizzo, he personally participated almost zero - delegating subordinates - in almost all the discussions among the principles on both issues.

The CIA legal team itself would have preferred to see the detainees charged and imprisoned in the civilian courts, but accepted the arguments that the trials would present difficulties in the security of the intelligence gained and the intelligence procedures and that keeping those issues in check would present difficulties in prosecution - as later cases demonstrated.

Personally, I do not understand why any of them could not see the clarity of the “war time” analogy, that (1) the purpose of detaining prisonsers in war is to (a)get information and (b) keep them off the battlefield and (2) it is not our fault that the detainees were not acting on behalf of any sovereign to whom we could ‘sign a peace treaty and know the war was over’, and therefor (3) it is not our fault, but the nature of THEIR KIND OF WAR, that the period of their detention will be INDEFINITE.


47 posted on 01/12/2014 9:17:51 PM PST by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative
I’m shocked, shocked...


48 posted on 01/12/2014 9:31:36 PM PST by RichInOC (No! BAD Rich! (What'd I say?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson