Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Wyatt's Torch

Notice in the chart it was even lower pre-1979. That’s because there were a lot more single income families back then.


33 posted on 01/10/2014 6:11:37 AM PST by cuban leaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: cuban leaf

Back then, you didn’t have to work three jobs to support your government leech.


36 posted on 01/10/2014 6:16:17 AM PST by NY.SS-Bar9 (Those that vote for a living outnumber those that work for one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: cuban leaf

Indeed. It’s important to note that they were single income families because they didn’t need to be two income families. Now in many cases single-income families used to be two income families and they’re in trouble. Any participation number today in fact signifies far more economic distress than a comparable number back then.


38 posted on 01/10/2014 6:18:10 AM PST by jiggyboy (Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: cuban leaf
Right. The increase in participation rate was driven primarily by women in the workforce. Male participation rate has been steadily declining since the 1950's.


48 posted on 01/10/2014 6:41:46 AM PST by Wyatt's Torch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson