Roberts opinion is ludicrous, though binding for now. Justify the severe and unauthorized overreach of the Feds to govern local healthcare finance and delivery by focusing on an essentially thro away aspect of the law. What Roberts should have focused on is individuals forced to pay substantially more for policies to benefit the private welfare of Obama’s constituents. Is this justifiable under the commerce clause? Is it a tax? Or is it a penalty fine? Founders think Roberts is an arse.
Roberts directly contradicted himself. He upheld the law because it’s a tax, then rejected a plea that it’s a tax that violates the Constitution because it originated in the Senate.
A shame the country is circling the drain right now because of two illegally adopted children.
Some one should focus on the totally outrageous cost of healthcare, it bears absolutely no relationship to the salary of the individuals they service.
If it were not for insurance and government interference you could probably afford healthcare on your own.
When I was a kid, if turpentine or kerosene didn't fix it, oh well.
I agree; Roberts opinion is ludicrous