Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 2ndDivisionVet

How consenting adults choose to order their private lives is none of the States business. None whatsoever.


2 posted on 01/05/2014 1:55:16 PM PST by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Lurker

Just what has changed in the nature of mankind, in the last 5,000 years, to make you think that?
Heck, a third of Hammurabi’s Code is devoted to matters of relationships.


12 posted on 01/05/2014 2:30:43 PM PST by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Lurker

The world has accepted polygamy more then sodomy. If the US makes sodomy legal then it has no grounds to say no to polygamy. If Americans are smart men should have more then one wife. Think of the combined incomes and exemptions. Our tax laws are not geared for polygamy. Do the math. If a man has one wife and two kids making 250 000 annually vs a man who has five wives and ten kids making 500 000 annually. I think the guy with five wives and ten kids make out tax wise. Another point is if man and wife both work can barely afford two kids, will a man and five wives working do better? I think financially yes. Big gov will not be able to collect much taxes from a man with five wives and ten kids (fifteen exemptions plus self) compared to a man with one wife and two kids (three exemptions plus self). There is only one catch to this arrangement - old Chinese saying, two women under roof can mean trouble.


17 posted on 01/05/2014 2:41:17 PM PST by Fee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Lurker

This isn’t about privacy, it is about marriage law.

Yours is one of those new, stylish, lefty trends, when was America free of marriage law?


18 posted on 01/05/2014 2:43:53 PM PST by ansel12 ( Ben Bradlee -- JFK told me that "he was all for people's solving their problems by abortion".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Lurker
How consenting adults choose to order their private lives is none of the States business. None whatsoever.

Does that also mean that married couples could no longer file a joint return. What about the rule protecting a spouse from testifying against the other in court? Do the courts have any say about custody and visitation in divorce cases? Is state sanctioned divorce even possible? How does division of property get adjudicated? If we are just cohabitating, then how can there be any common property?

22 posted on 01/05/2014 2:52:56 PM PST by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Lurker
How consenting adults choose to order their private lives is none of the States business. None whatsoever.

That's way too much individual freedom for millions of people.

40 posted on 01/05/2014 3:10:46 PM PST by Standing Wolf (No tyrant should ever be allowed to die of natural causes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Lurker
Your statement is illogical .....if government stayed out of peoples lives..then the government need do nothing but stay mute on marriage and let it be the religious vow of its origin.........government would see no difference in people being married or not married...and surely have no concept of consuming a marriage..ie having sex, to decide if a marriage can be annulled vs a divorced........ but its called a marriage “license”..its the government providing something special if you do something the government wants..it promotes it provides for..its a so called “positive” right...
73 posted on 01/05/2014 5:17:43 PM PST by tophat9000 (Are we headed to a Cracker Slacker War?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Lurker
How consenting adults choose to order their private lives is none of the States business. None whatsoever.

When it ceases to be a private matter between consenting adults, and instead is an effort to force people to shut-up telling the truth about the disgusting, perverted, immoral, and sinful lifestyle of Homosexuality, then I beg to differ, maybe it is time to go back to outlawing behavior.

Forcing business owners to serve perverts (Gays), or making it a law that you cannot discriminate against someone because of their CHOSEN sexual lifestyle forces this whole question into another realm.
81 posted on 01/05/2014 6:15:25 PM PST by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Lurker
How consenting adults choose to order their private lives is none of the States business. None whatsoever.

Until their 17 children require food stamps to feed and other "state benefits" at taxpayer expense.

Their "rights" stop when they infringe on MY right to NOT have my paycheck stolen by the state to care for THEIR kids.

That's just one example.

123 posted on 01/06/2014 3:35:42 PM PST by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson