Even Mr. Malthus could point out that no population can exceed its ability to feed itself. As food grows short, propensity to disease, violence and other elements that limit population increase.
Any child of ten could understand that. The fact that you didn’t does a serious disservice to your position.
So, you’re one of the “population stability throughout this time” banner wavers. The author addressed this argument.
Yeah but evolutionists would have us believe that man was making tools 200,000 years ago. To believe they couldn't find enough food is not very plausible. They would have dominated the food chain.
If you start with 6 people and double them every 100 years, it takes 28 centuries to reach a billion people.
Population growth has accelerated in the last couple of centuries, but to get the ages evolution requires, man would have had to have remained at very small numbers for a very very very long time. It's not believable.