[fwdude]

I hate to say is, but Sean Hannity, on who’s show he was subbing, has the same disdain for moral issues. Why else would he allow the likes of Boortz to sit in?

Likewise, Rush, Mark Levin, and a few others avoid the issues of homo-fascism like the plague.

[Oshkalaboomboom]

I hate to say is, but Sean Hannity, on who’s show he was subbing, has the same disdain for moral issues. Why else would he allow the likes of Boortz to sit in?

Because Boortz is very good on fiscal issues, is a big supporter of the Fair Tax and hates Barack Obama. His down side is he's big into self promotion and this rant has kept his name at the top of the headlines so he can be guaranteed to get more calls for subbing in, leading to a very healthy retirement income.

[Scoutmaster]

Sean Hannity came to national attention when he moved to Atlanta and began to compete against the established Neal Boortz.

Boortz posts his program notes on the internet each morning and Boortz rarely has guests.

It's no secret in Atlanta (or the broadcasting business) that Hannity would read Boortz's program notes each morning and then plan his show based on those notes. The difference is that Hannity's people would scramble to find a guest or two to speak on the show.

[Faith]

I hate to say is, but Sean Hannity, on who’s show he was subbing, has the same disdain for moral issues. Why else would he allow the likes of Boortz to sit in?

Did he sub for Hannity? I heard him when he subbed for Herman Cain last week.