I should think there’s the President himself. I acknowledge it’d be difficult for the pubs to label a politico a liar but a stranger?
“Gee, did you think the President was telling the truth when he said if you like your health care you can keep it? Could it be that so-and-so liberal-boob you like is also lying?”
The pubs could, just throwing it out there, mention John Edwards, a guy who ran for VP that turned out to be a whoring liar fathering a child with a piece of trash while his wife was dying of cancer. Did the public know any of this when the guy was running for Vice President? Why is it so far-fetched that Hillary allowed Americans to die helplessly in Benghazi? Unlike John Edwards, there IS lots of documentation on Behghazi.
And could add that Hillary was disbarred, told us frogs were sitting on fence posts re Monica Lewinski, was a member of the Communist party....on and on. If the response is I don’t know about any of this....well how many of us knew the Presidents was lying about health care or that John Edwards was such a slob bucket. Both things had the truth been known would have likely cost them an election.
WHY NOT CHECK THINGS OUT NOW THAT WE’RE TELLING YOU AHEAD OF TIME?
The pubs, they won’t do this. They’re too busy attacking the Tea Party....yeah, that’s the ticket.
My recollection is that this sort of conduct used to be described as "Cutting off your nose to spite your face".
Now, I guess it's Cutting Edge political thought, and it probably will only get worse until the whole bloody bunch gets run out of town.
Only question remaining (JMHO) is if we'll be allowed to do this by casting our votes this next year.
...options to that deal really are going to suck.