Posted on 12/29/2013 3:52:51 AM PST by Libloather
A senior Obama administration official said the White House does not dispute a New York Times article published Saturday about the 2012 attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya, which found no evidence al Qaeda was involved.
**SNIP**
The newspaper said its investigation took months and was "centered on extensive interviews with Libyans in Benghazi who had direct knowledge of the attack there and its context."
It is not surprising the White House would welcome this report. Since the attack, Republicans have accused the Obama administration of downplaying the perpetrators' links to al Qaeda for political gain. The attack took place during the last leg of the 2012 presidential campaign.
(Excerpt) Read more at usnews.nbcnews.com ...
Why not? While you're at it, find out who gave the 'stand down' order.
NBC picks up the baton to run a lap for Hilda.....(she’s gonna be knocking them back and develop a kidney problem before this is over).....HILDA LIED,PEOPLE DIED
We will never know the truth about this—and no one will ever be charged, convicted or prosecuted.
I guess we are used to gummit cover-ups by now...............
I grieve for this once great land.
Benghazi ping.
Let Republicanprofessor know if you want on or off this ping list.
Soon we will be hearing the new tag line “It is time we have a women for president” much like “it is time we have a black man for president” When you hear the on the street question “how do you feel about Bengahzi”? and the reply from the majority is “I don’t know the guy” you can see she will be a shoo in.
Undocumented Moslem White House (by Pelosi’s perjury
and the Congress’ whoring docility) does not
dispute the false rumor which Obama/Clinton fabricated
and then put out to the MSM.
Straigt up politcal cover piece for shillary, because they already know the rest of the LSM has obama’s back on this. This is just setting her up for 2016. Absolutely disgusting the low’s of the LSM.
Soon to be followed by it’s time for a gay president.
Why should the White House complain about the New York Times report?
They probably wrote it.
This is the White-Wash Hillary Campaign, which will treat us to serial lying to get that witch into office in 2016.
We can only pray for God’s mercy in preventing this curse.
Heroes and patriots in the ground, cowards and traitors in power.
Would be funny if it weren’t so true.
Om my knees right now. I shudder to think what will become of our once great nation.
I think that ship has sailed...
Speaking to the utter incompetence of this administration is that we still don’t have a full report a year and 3 months later.
Note that Kirkpatrick’s narrative is from some Muslim recollections and assertions well after the incident. Typical tool for those without facts but with a desire to deflect attention elsewhere.
How about whether it was pre-planned or in response to the video? Does the WH dispute that?
Who cares which terrorist group they had ties to?
There are other terrorist groups?
“The six-part report goes on to say that an American-made video mocking Islam largely triggered the attack, which was not well-planned.”
They’re still pushing the video BS.
ha - long time
Merry Christmas & Happy 2014 to you
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.