I agree with you.
Go here: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3106133/posts
and see post #14 and go here: http://shoebat.com/2013/06/30/benghazi-turning-a-blind-eye-for-the-blind-sheikh/
Let’s assume, yaelle, that the rewrite of history is to benefit Hillary. What does she need to accomplish more than being able to say, “An in-depth investigative article by the NYTimes says we were right, that Benghazi was inflamed by a video and that al-Qaeda was not personally involved.”
She can say that now.
How should conservatives deal with that?
If the NY Times can declare Hillary innocent why does she not want Issa to investigate and find the same thing.
Great sources.
Yes, you can put money on it that this article will be pointed to forever after as “this has been fully investigated” by Hillary.
Fight, fight.