[Washi]

Very good article.

[FreedBird]

The Democrat Party bullied their way to Obamacare with no Republican votes. Now they want to bully us to accept their disaster.

[Iron Munro]

The biggest bully in the world, and the biggest threat to individual freedom, is the Obama government, a corrupt mob of bullys run by democrat party racketeers and dedicated to destroying the US Constitution.

[Servant of the Cross]

The radical shock troops seeking to “fundamentally transform the United States of America,” as their pied piper puts it, make up a distinct minority of the country. To advance their transformative program, they need the mob — and a president who knows how to use the mob’s “peer pressure,” who knows that telling a room full of jittery bankers that “my administration is the only thing between you and the pitchforks” is akin to Don Corleone making them an offer they can’t refuse.

Consequently, we are not in ordinary times — times when speech competes with speech in Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes’s “marketplace of ideas,” and when we are simply trying to arrive at the best policies within an agreed-upon constitutional framework. We are in an us-versus-them time when the radicals are out to annihilate traditional culture and constitutional principles.

[oldbrowser]

It can bring vexatious lawsuits, knowingly enact unconstitutional laws, or sign international agreements transparently intended to erode constitutional liberties.

There is a belief among legislators that it's not up to them to judge the constitutionality of the laws they write. They leave that up to the courts.

The administration and it's agencies feel free to interpret, adapt, and enforce the laws as they choose.

The Chief justice doesn't feel obligated to overrule the poor decisions of the people's elected representatives; if he can fit them into any little corner of the constitution

[loveliberty2]

Perhaps just a bit of Jeffersonian wisdom might warrant a little attention as an offset to the foolishness of the so-called "progressives" who have dominated our politics recently.

Excerpt from Jefferson's Notes on Virginia:

The Works of Thomas Jefferson, Federal Edition (New York and London, G.P. Putnam’s Sons, 1904-5). Vol. 4. Author: Thomas Jefferson Editor: Paul Leicester Ford Part of: The Works of Thomas Jefferson, 12 vols.
QUERY XVII

(Excerpt)
The different religions received into that state?
"But our rulers can have authority over such natural rights, only as we have submitted to them. The rights of conscience we never submitted, we could not submit. We are answerable for them to our God. The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others.1 But it does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods, or no god. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg. If it be said his testimony in a court of justice cannot be relied on, reject it then, and be the stigma on him. Constraint may make him worse by making him a hypocrite, but it will never make him a truer man. It may fix him obstinately in his errors, but will not cure [293] them. Reason and free inquiry are the only effectual agents against error. Give a loose to them, they will support the true religion by bringing every false one to their tribunal, to the test of their investigation. They are the natural enemies of error, and of error only. Had not the Roman government permitted free inquiry, christianity could never have been introduced. Had not free inquiry been indulged, at the æra of the reformation, the corruptions of christianity could not have been purged away. If it be restrained now, the present corruptions will be protected, and new ones encouraged. Was the government to prescribe to us our medicine and diet, our bodies would be in such keeping as our souls are now. Thus in France the emetic was once forbidden as a medicine, and the potatoe as an article of food.
Government is just as infallible, too, when it fixes systems in physics. Galileo was sent to the inquisition for affirming that the earth was a sphere; the government had declared it to be as flat as a trencher, and Galileo was obliged to abjure his error. This error however at length prevailed, the earth became a globe, and Descartes declared [294] it was whirled round its axis by a vortex. The government in which he lived was wise enough to see that this was no question of civil jurisdiction, or we should all have been involved by authority in vortices. In fact the vortices have been exploded, and the Newtonian principles of gravitation is now more firmly established, on the basis of reason, than it would be were the government to step in and to make it an article of necessary faith. Reason and experiment have been indulged, and error has fled before them. It is error alone which needs the support of government. Truth can stand by itself. Subject opinion to coercion: whom will you make your inquisitors? Fallible men; men governed by bad passions, by private as well as public reasons. And why subject it to coercion? To produce uniformity. But is uniformity of opinion desireable? No more than of face and stature."

Note that although Jefferson discusses matters related to religion in the beginning of this excerpted portion of Query XVII, the final paragraph shown here relates to government's being "infallible" in matters related to science (physics) as well.

"Progressives," take note. Your attempts at coercion of opinion on scientific matters simply reveal your lack of understanding of the benefits of freedom of conscience and opinion.