[alloysteel]

I believe the word is “sophistry”, adroit reasoning, but based on a specious premise. It SOUNDS plausible and logical, but is ultimately flawed, and only makes for confused interpretation and wrongful application.

Nothing has EVER prevented any person of homosexual inclinations from marrying. Only just not a person of the same sex.

It is possible that a complex cross-connection could be worked out where two gays could select, in separate ceremonies, two lesbians with whom they could exchange vows, then set up a combined household, and still not be in breach of the law as it existed. Nobody would ever have to know what was going on behind closed doors.

[FredZarguna]

It's not sophistry. His characterization is simply wrong. See my previous post.

[Cheerio]

Nothing has EVER prevented any person of homosexual inclinations from marrying. Only just not a person of the same sex.

AND one cannot marry your cousin, someone who is already married, your children, animals, etc. BUT once the gay mafia has destroyed the term marriage, then anything goes and the court cases will not even be able to be counted once these flood gates are opened.

GOD WILL HAVE THE LAST SAY ABOUT THESE PERVERTS NOW RUNNING THIS COUNTRY.