Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gay couples wed in Utah after judge overturns ban
Boston.com ^ | 12/21/13 | BRADY McCOMBS

Posted on 12/21/2013 6:26:00 AM PST by SoFloFreeper

A federal judge struck down Utah’s same-sex marriage ban Friday in a decision that marks a drastic shift toward gay marriage in a conservative state where the Mormon church has long been against it.

The decision set off an immediate frenzy as the clerk in the state’s most populous county began issuing marriage licenses to dozens of gay couples while state officials took steps to appeal the ruling and halt the process.

Cheers erupted as the mayor of Salt Lake City led one of the state’s first gay wedding ceremonies in an office building about three miles from the headquarters of the Mormon church.

Deputy Salt Lake County Clerk Dahnelle Burton-Lee said the district attorney authorized her office to begin issuing licenses to same-sex couples but she couldn’t immediately say how many had been issued.

(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: Utah
KEYWORDS: federalism; homosexualagenda; lds; mormon; mormonism; perversion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: SoFloFreeper; All
Yes the Utah State Constitution Amendment said:

Marriage consists only of the legal union between a man and a woman. No other domestic union, however denominated, may be recognized as a marriage or given the same or substantially equivalent legal effect.

The Judge struck down a amendment to a state constitution. Will this stand?

21 posted on 12/21/2013 8:57:04 AM PST by sr4402
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yardstick

In 1965 in Griswold the Supreme Court first created a doctrine from the First, Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments that sexual identity, expression and self-determination were Constitutionally protected, holding in that case that Connecticut couldn’t limit unmarried women’s access to birth control. While one of its first progeny (Loving in 1967, striking down anti-miscegenation laws) made race a co-issue, it was quite clear that the doctrine did not depend any full equation of race with sexuality, or turn in any particular way on identity or immutable characteristics, versus conduct, at all. Roe in 1973 famously extended the doctrine to abortion — pure conduct.

In 1986, the Supreme Court rejected the doctrine as applicable to homosexuality in Bowers v Hardwick, but 1996’s Romer v Evans began to move the other way, and 2003’s Lawrence completed the reversal of course, finding a Constitutional entitlement to homosexual conduct and identity. The 2013 marriage cases unified the Loving and Lawrence streams of thinking.

So it will be exactly 50 years after Grisold when in June 2015 the Supreme Court will either uphold yesterday’s Utah decision or one just like it, or require all states to recognize a gay marriage legal where it was solemnized (two avenues which have the precise same result).


22 posted on 12/21/2013 10:09:36 AM PST by only1percent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: sr4402

Not in my world does it stand.

Tenth Amendment.


23 posted on 12/21/2013 3:36:09 PM PST by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: molson209

federal judge. lifetime appointment unless removed by the federal legislature (congress).


24 posted on 12/21/2013 3:36:54 PM PST by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: madprof98

They can now learn the happiness of divorce.


25 posted on 12/21/2013 8:07:17 PM PST by goat granny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson