Secret Group Controls The World

SMR ^ | December 12, 2013

[NYer]

So who really controls the world? The Illuminati? Freemasons? The Bilderberg Group?

Or are these all red herrings to distract your prying eyes from the real global elite? The answer, like most topics worth exploring, is not quite so simple. Have no doubt, there are secretive global powers whose only goal is to keep and grow that power. But it really may not be as secretive as you would think. And that is what makes it even more nefarious. But don't take my word for it, we have both science and insider testimony to back it up.

We are going to break this down into three categories: Financial, Political and Media. This is a harder task than you may imagine, since they all work in concert by design.


Financial Elite

Thanks to the science of complex system theory, the answer may actually be right in front of our faces. This scientific process sheds light on the dark corners of bank control and international finance and pulls some of the major players out from the shadows. It goes back to the old credo: Just follow the money. Systems theorist James B. Glattfelder did just that.

From a massive database of 37 million companies, Glattfelder pulled out the 43,060 transnational corporations (companies that operate in more than one country) that are all connected by their shareholders.

Digging further, he constructed a model that actually displays just how connected these companies are to one another through ownership of shares and their corresponding operating revenues.

See the globe chart on the following page.

I will openly admit that this graphic almost scared me off. Complex scientific theories are not my forte, and this looks like some sort of intergalactic snow globe.

But Glattfelder has done a remarkable job of boiling these connections down to the main actors — as well as pinpointing how much power they have over the global market. These "ownership networks" can reveal who the key players are, how they are organized, and exactly how interconnected these powers are.

From New Scientist:
Each of the 1318 had ties to two or more other companies and, on average, they were connected to 20. What is more, although they represented 20% of global operating revenues, the 1318 appeared to collectively own, through their shares, the majority of the world's large blue chip and manufacturing firms—the "real" economy — representing a further 60% of global revenues.

When the team further untangled the web of ownership, it found much of it tracked back to a "superentity" of 147 even more tightly knit companies — all of their ownership was held by other members of the super-entity — that controlled 40% of the total wealth in the network.

According to his data, Glattfelder found that the top 730 shareholders control a whopping 80% of the entire revenue of transnational corporations. And — surprise, surprise! — they are mostly financial institutions in the United States and the United Kingdom. That is a huge amount of concentrated control in a small number of hands.

Here are the top ten transnational companies that hold the most control over the global economy (and if you are one of the millions that are convinced Big Banks run the world, you should get a creeping sense of validation from this list):
1) Barclays plc
2) Capital Group Companies Inc.
3) FMR Corporation
4) AXA
5) State Street Corporation
6) JPMorgan Chase & Co.
7) Legal & General Group plc
8) Vanguard Group Inc.
9) UBS AG
10) Merrill Lynch & Co Inc.

Some of the other usual suspects round out the top 25, including JP Morgan, UBS, Credit Suisse, and Goldman Sachs.

What you will not find are ExxonMobil, Microsoft, or General Electric, which I found shocking.

In fact, you have to scroll all the way down to China Petrochemical Group Company at number 50 to find a company that actually creates something.

The top 49 corporations are financial institutions, banks, and insurance companies — with the exception of Wal-Mart, which ranks at number 15.

The rest essentially just push money around to one another.

Here is the interconnectedness of the top players in this international scheme:

Here is a fun fact about the number one player, Barclays:

Barclays was a main player in the LIBOR manipulation scandal, and were found to have committed fraud and collusion with other interconnected big banks. They were fined $200 million by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, $160 million by the United States Department of Justice and £59.5 million by the Financial Services Authority for "attempted manipulation" of the Libor and Euribor rates.

Despite their crimes, Barclays still paid $61,781,950 in bonuses earlier this year, including a whopping $27,371,750 to investment banking head Rich Ricci. And yes, that's actually his real name.

These are the guys that run the world.

It is essentially the "too big to fail" argument laid out in a scientific setting — only instead of just the U.S. banks, we are talking about an international cabal of banks and financial institutions so intertwined that they pose a serious threat to global economics. Instead of "too big to fail," we are looking at "too connected to fail".

Glattfelder contends that "a high degree of interconnectivity can be bad for stability, because stress can spread through the system like an epidemic."

Industrialist Henry Ford once quipped, "It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and money system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning."

It is one thing to have suspicions that someone is working behind the scenes to control the world's money supply. It is quite another to have scientific evidence that clearly supports it. But these guys can only exist within a political system that supports their goals. And those political systems are pretty much operating in the open.


POLITCAL ELITE

For the sake of brevity, let us cut right to the chase. Every major geopolitical decision of the last few decades has been run through one of these three organizations: the Trilateral Commission, the Council on Foreign Relations and the World Bank/International Monetary Fund (IMF).

The Trilateral Commission

In 1973, the infamous David Rockefeller created a group of the world's power brokers to work together —    outside of any official governmental or political allegiance — to bring about cooperation of North America, Western Europe and Japan. They launched under the guise of working together to solve the world's problems. A noble goal — but “problems” are very subjective.

Here is the rundown of members:

The North American continent is represented by 120 members (20 Canadian, 13 Mexican and 87 U.S. citizens).

The European group has reached its limit of 170 members from almost every country on the continent; the ceilings for individual countries are 20 for Germany, 18 for France, Italy and the United Kingdom, 12 for Spain and 1-6 for the rest.

At first, Asia and Oceania were represented only by Japan. However, in 2000, the Japanese group of 85 members expanded itself, becoming the Pacific Asia group, composed of 117 members: 75 Japanese, 11 South Koreans, 7 Australian and New Zealand citizens, and 15 members from the ASEAN nations (Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore and Thailand). The Pacific Asia group also included 9 members from China, Hong Kong and Taiwan. Currently, the Trilateral Commission claims "more than 100" Pacific Asian members.

It is a global who's-who of power brokers. While the Trilateral Commission excludes anyone currently holding public office from membership, it serves as a revolving door of the rich and powerful from the financial, political and academic elite.

Most suspicions of the group began during the Jimmy Carter administration, when Carter — himself a member of the Trilateral Commission — made Zbigniew Brzezinski his National Security advisor. Brzezinski was the Trilateral Commission's first executive director. Carter's Vice President Walter Mondale was also a member. Perhaps most importantly, Trilateral member Paul Volker served as Carter's Chair of the Federal Reserve. He is still the North American Honorary Chairman.

Such a concentration of power in a U.S. president's cabinet obviously made people nervous,

Notable recent additions include Austan Goolsbe — former chairman for Obama's Council of Economic Advisors. I would suggest you familiarize yourselves with the entire member list here. You will be shocked at who else is part of this secretive organization.

In next week's piece, we will examine the rest of the global elite — the Council on Foreign Relations, the International Monetary Fund, and the World Bank. We will also share testimony from an IMF whistle blower that has admitted that the IMF was deeply involved in global fraud and contends that “the public doesn't really know what's going on and...we do not have a democracy.”

We will also unveil the concentrated control of the media that makes all of this possible in the first place. You will not want to miss that bombshell.

[NYer]

Ping!

[Safrguns]

The anti-christ does.

Yes... he is alive today... just not revealed yet.

[ZULU]

Yes. But the Freemasons do NOT control the world and the Illuminati do not exist.

The Council on Foreign Relations and the Bilderberger Group DO exist and they DO have a MONUMENTAL impact impact on national and international affairs,

NEITHER group consists of people elected by ANYONE but themselves and BOTH groups are PACKED with wealthy international elitists whose goal is a one-world government.

[Cringing Negativism Network]

Yet the next financial heavyweight in the world, China, isn’t even mentioned.

People we need to start paying a lot more attention to China.

All our factories are there now.

They are making stuff which is sold here, but China is acquiring ever-more manufacturing prowess.

And they own all the manufacturing. We just buy from it.

Bring back American manufacturing. Now.

[Eric in the Ozarks]

Have you checked under your bed ?

[FreedomStar3028]

Every once in awhile something is posted on FR that makes me check my kook meter.

[DLfromthedesert]

LOL!!!

[Standing Wolf]

I’d tell you what Frisky the wonder tigress told me, but she’d probably kill me and devour my corpse.

[Repeal The 17th]

None dare call it a conspiracy...

[AlexW]

“Secret Group Controls The World”
___________________________________________________
This has been a conundrum for years, and I am sure that the truth is somewhere between fact and fiction.
I am now too old to even think about it, and what if it were true.....How would anyone be better off if the facts were known? Live and let live.

[Common Sense 101]

Wow... I’d like to have that 3 minutes of my life back.

[CrazyIvan]

The Stonecutters:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p0mjG9-CA3w&feature=youtube_gdata_player

[DIRTYSECRET]

It’s 7 Jewish bankers that get together every year in Geneva and decide where there’s gonna be a war.

[Popman]

Every major geopolitical decision of the last few decades has been run through one of these three organizations: the Trilateral Commission, the Council on Foreign Relations and the World Bank/International Monetary Fund (IMF).

Really ?

The fall of the Soviet Union was run through which one of these organizations ?

[RayChuang88]

But those financial institutions—especially Barclays plc—yikes!

[arderkrag]

Yet another post proving that conspiracy theories are the only things so dumb they’re wrong even when they’re right.

[Yardstick]

That was my thought too: it’s cats.

[Sivad]

Here we go again. The kind of stuff that unites the Amy Goodmans
and Ross Perots of the world.

[caver]

“The Pacific Asia group also included 9 members from China, Hong Kong and Taiwan.”

This sentence mentions China.