Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LonelyCon

I like how the article calls it simply a ‘law.’ I mean we are talking about the Utah constitutional amendment here, right?

I wonder if this one goes to the SC if the will interpret it like CA’s prop. 8 or if this is the end of state marriage amendments everywhere.

Freegards


16 posted on 12/20/2013 3:00:23 PM PST by Ransomed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Ransomed
I wonder if this one goes to the SC if the will interpret it like CA’s prop. 8 or if this is the end of state marriage amendments everywhere.

That depends on if a state official man's up and defends it. Remember, the Prop 8 case was simply remanded for lack of standing, not on its merits. It actually still exists in California. Only, the Leftist Governor and AG refused to defend it.

42 posted on 12/20/2013 3:36:10 PM PST by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Ransomed

Constitutions? The 10th amendment? The media doesn’t care. The biological deadends are getting “married”—for some unknown reason that serves no useful purpose.


70 posted on 12/21/2013 7:11:25 AM PST by CaspersGh0sts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson