I like how the article calls it simply a ‘law.’ I mean we are talking about the Utah constitutional amendment here, right?
I wonder if this one goes to the SC if the will interpret it like CA’s prop. 8 or if this is the end of state marriage amendments everywhere.
Freegards
That depends on if a state official man's up and defends it. Remember, the Prop 8 case was simply remanded for lack of standing, not on its merits. It actually still exists in California. Only, the Leftist Governor and AG refused to defend it.
Constitutions? The 10th amendment? The media doesn’t care. The biological deadends are getting “married”—for some unknown reason that serves no useful purpose.