She was right. Don’t you love the shock when she called Bill wrong?
Bill needs to do his back-flips to appear to be “above the fray”. Total phony.
OReally was being very judgmental in calling Robertson judgmental.
Bill is one of those cafeteria Catholics who tear out the pages he doesn’t agree with.
Pray America is Waking
Ted Baxter did a very poor job of stating the Christian case. He kept saying that homosexuality is only condemed in the Old Testament. . . he could not be more wrong about that.
What really upset me is that he mischaracterized the admonition of Christians not to judge. We are commanded not to judge the eternal fate of individuals. That is reserved to the Son at the end times. Also, any man can be reconciled to God until the time he dies and then enter salvation. However, bet your last dollar on the fact that we, as Christians are in fact EXPECTED TO JUDGE BEHAVIOR. It is essential if one is to attempt to live a life even remotely close to what God expects of us. From a practical standpoint, Christian or not, we ALL have to do that daily just to survive.
Although he did not quite get it done, Phil made an attempt to drive home the point that we are ALL sinners in the eyes of God and, without Jesus, will be condemned eternally. I think the difference in homosexuality, as indicated in the first chapter of Romans, is that homosexuality can be a sign that an individual has rejected God, and God has responded by giving them over to their sin and lust. That does not bode well for their chances of ultimate reconciliation to God, but again, all things are possible with God and an eventual reconciliation would be possible to the glory of God and the work of the Holy Spirit. . . IMHO
Phil Robertson was voicing his opinion! That used to be OK, didn’t it?
I learned in elementary school “sticks and stones will break my bones but words will never hurt me!”.
O'Reily was lost in the weeds over this.
Homosexuals are so thin skinned and whine more than anybody else. I can’t believe anyone could “evolve” into believing that they’d be a great asset to our military. About all they’ve done since DADT was done away with is whine about religious practices and traditions in the military. Doing away with DADT was a pretty piss poor idea, IMHO.