Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fwdude

Perhaps Phil knew full well he would be expressing the truth about homosexuality. Maybe he wanted this boil lanced.

Phil basically said (except for the whole vagina vs. anus part) what all Christian preachers should be saying from the pulpits of America (and Canada). Are they now guilty of “hate” speech as well? What would the lavender mafia do with the truth-speaking preachers of the world?


13 posted on 12/19/2013 3:53:08 AM PST by JudyinCanada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: JudyinCanada
...(except for the whole vagina vs. anus part)...

Why the exception? Was the statement not anatomically correct? Does it not follow God's plan at Genesis?

25 posted on 12/19/2013 5:02:20 AM PST by T-Bird45 (It feels like the seventies, and it shouldn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: JudyinCanada
Perhaps Phil knew full well he would be expressing the truth about homosexuality. Maybe he wanted this boil lanced.

You may be right, and perhaps I was a little hasty in judging the situation. This incident could potentially high-light the true, demonic character of the homosexual movement to the entire nation. The network calling his comments, based on biblical morality, "vile" while granting the opposite characterization of the truly vile culture of homosexuality is really quite bizarre. No one but the most blinded reprobates will fail to notice this supreme irony.

27 posted on 12/19/2013 6:33:57 AM PST by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson