[Elsie]

Though I disagree with the guy's decision, I understand his rationale: If keeping one traditionally nonstandard from marrying and it is unconstitutional, then stopping any non-traditional set of prospective folks/beasts/objects is also unconstitutional.

Yeah...

I, too, understand the rationale: If killing the unwanted and unneeded human in a CHOOSEY mother's womb is constitutional, then getting rid of unwanted and unneeded Gramma is ALSO constitutional.

[trebb]

Sigh - you really are full of yourself - time for a full-body/mind diaper change. You made my point by using the exact sick rationale I was talking about. Do you cherry-pick on purpose or are you incapable of doing otherwise? Your example is exactly what follows this guy's decision and steepens the slippery slope I mentioned.

Your hatred of Mormons, and those that won't condemn them with the same zeal as you, is affecting you deeply. Neither one of us likes the rationale, but you interpret an understanding as an agreement and have to attack just because that's what you're good at. I haven't seen/read you trying to carry the Love of God and the sacrifice of Christ with any sort of regularity, but the hate comes out often - funny way of proving your "superiority". Back in the day, you would probably have applied for the "Pull the cord that drops the blade on the necks of the heretics" position.