Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kobald

If they wanted to do something useful they could arrange to have closed primaries at the state level.
Of course McCain and Linda would be opposed to it.


20 posted on 12/11/2013 9:19:43 AM PST by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Zathras

Could the process be better? Sure. Does it really matter? No. The conservative champion who can’t beat Christie in at least one of Iowa or New Hampshire under the current rules is not going to be able to beat Hillary Clinton or Joe Biden in Ohio or Florida.


51 posted on 12/11/2013 10:50:51 AM PST by only1percent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Zathras
If they wanted to do something useful they could arrange to have closed primaries at the state level. Of course McCain and Linda would be opposed to it.

Amen to that! It absolutely enraged me that the Dems in SC were allowed to cross over to vote for McStain in '08. That was the state that was to give Fred Thompson momentum going into Super Tuesday...but the Dems didn't want to face Thompson.

WTF is the point of calling something a REPUBLICAN primary if ANYONE can vote in it? How about forcing people to prove that they've been registered as Republicans for at least 6 months? Open primaries force the candidate choices to the left wing, since almost all crossovers are actually Dem voters (some multiple times in each election) - and for the Party to allow that to occur speaks of a wilful set of actions.

67 posted on 12/11/2013 11:34:08 AM PST by Ancesthntr ("The right to buy weapons is the right to be free." A. E. van Vogt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson