This guy is not just “illegal trash”. He is a deadly psycho-killer. There is absolutely no reason for him to be put in prison, he needs to be put down *by the police* like the rabid dog he is.
Seriously, nobody complains when a cop shoots a rabid dog. There is no suggestion of “police brutality” or “exceeding his authority”, “cruel and unusual punishment”, or any other such nonsense.
Across the US, police departments now have unwritten policies that if they are approached by a dog they consider just “menacing”, they are to shoot it. While this is a deeply flawed policy, considering how many non-menacing dogs are shot, there is no way that police departments are going to discontinue this practice.
So if police *know* they are pursuing hardened organized crime gang killers, or even have one in custody, *why not* have a policy of putting them down?
It does not have the flaw that they don’t know if “the dog” is “menacing” or not, they *know* that it is rabid, not just menacing.
They *know* that these scum are hardcore, murderous fiends.
There is *no* possibility of redemption on Earth, there. No possibility of rehabilitation. Nothing.
And there is *no* reason to waste millions of taxpayer dollars to try and maximum security incarcerate such monsters. Nobody will shed a tear if they get a bullet in them in discreet circumstances, where there is no surviving witness other than the officer.
Police departments just need three criteria to do this:
1) They must know who it is they are executing.
2) Beyond reasonable doubt they are heinous criminals.
3) Circumstances are such that it can be done discreetly.
I will add as an afterthought that the national police in Bangladesh faced ridiculous levels of violent crime until they instituted an unofficial “crossfire” policy, in which violent criminals “were caught in crossfire by the police”, which killed them. Hundreds of vicious, violent criminals have been dispatched this way.
I sure don’t trust the police to do that.