[TomGuy]

from The Daily Caller:

Liz Cheney speaks out on her campaign for US Senate

Would you have voted for the Gang of 8’s immigration bill?

I wouldn’t have voted for it. I think that there were too many good amendments, for example, that were not accepted, such as those offered by Sen. Cruz, that would have provided much more insurance in terms of border security. I am not comfortable with leaving so much discretion in the hands of the secretary for Homeland Security – to decide whether to carry out those provisions of the bill. And I think the bill as it stands now doesn’t deal with the most important issue we’ve got to address first, which is to secure the border.

Sounds like a lot of politospeak/gobbledygook. Any time they resort to the 'secure the border' canard, you know they are doing the dipsy-doodle fast-foot shuffle.

She is "not comfortable with". Huh? Are you FOR or AGAINST? That is a simple concept and it only requires a Yes or No response.

[rodguy911]

True but its a lot more than I expected.

Truth is I have always liked Liz but the way she is going about running is an obvious epic fail. She really does score however on those Sunday morning panels and in other venues on TV. There is undoubtedly a place for her it just won't be in the Senate apparently.At least not from Wyoming.

[rodguy911]

http://www.youtube.com/embed/4U1ShwjleSE

Don’t even think about going here if you are still drinking coffee or not ready to laugh your ass of for hours.
Thanks to Ex-Texas Redhead for the link.
This is nanceeee Piglooosi at here finest hour.

[JediJones]

I don’t think it’s gobbledygook, it’s pretty clear. It sounds like she’d be for amnesty if they secured the border first.

[norwaypinesavage]

"it only requires a Yes or No response."

Her first words were: "I wouldn't have voted for it." That sure sounds like "no" to me.