Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bill1952
Of course the City will actually have to PAY...

Not if the city just takes the property at NO COST and NO PAYMENT to the bank.

16 posted on 11/15/2013 3:17:25 PM PST by newfreep (Breitbart sent me...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: newfreep

Taking property by eminent domain requires a fair payment to the owner, but I guess no one really cares about laws anymore so I guess you’re right.


18 posted on 11/15/2013 3:23:55 PM PST by Tea Party Terrorist (Why work for a living when you can vote for a living?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: newfreep

Can’t be done. Even eminent domain is a legal action and process that has to go by the laws that govern such seizure.
That cannot be done other than fair market value and even that can be successfully challenged.
It will cost billions


27 posted on 11/15/2013 4:04:01 PM PST by bill1952 (Choice is an illusion created between those with power - and those without)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: newfreep

exactly. It’s been happening since the 90’s in the City of Rochester. They have a point system where even if something is not your fault, let’s say random residents start selling crack on or near your property, the City can literally take your property away with zero compensation.


49 posted on 11/16/2013 8:55:45 AM PST by AbolishCSEU (Percentage of Income in CS is inversely proportionate to Mother's parenting of children)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson