Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jimbo123

If the insurers go under, don’t we end up with single payer? The industry is extremely concentrated as it is. Is further concentration better or worse for the consumer?


13 posted on 11/15/2013 12:20:30 PM PST by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Zhang Fei

repeat after me “NO MORE BAILOUTS”

Aetna,WellPoint, UHC, Oxford - this means you!

Maybe the House can refuse to fund the bailouts.

This should be raised at every Republican primary.

Make the big-cat insurers sweat blood.


14 posted on 11/15/2013 12:55:30 PM PST by RossA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Zhang Fei

No way the Federal Government could stand up a single=payer system. Can you imagine the chaos if they tried to extend Medicare to everyone? NHS was erected with some difficulty after WWII because no country in Europe was so used to regimentation as Britain was in 1946 and so beaten down. A teacher for the DoD overseas schools I knew was in both Germany and England around 1950 and said she could hardly tell which country had suffered more, the “victor” or the “loser,”


16 posted on 11/15/2013 1:30:21 PM PST by RobbyS (quotes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson