Posted on 11/13/2013 12:41:18 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
In California, I have read that there are already lawsuits over the insurance companies neglecting to inform policyholders that plans *that have not been changed since 2010* are grandfathered. I don’t know if price increases or tightening of Preferred Provider participants qualifies as a *change*. I know that my husband’s premium was due to be increased last year solely due to zer0care. He was able to switch to a Bridge Policy in time to avoid a a 40% increase for 2013 and who knows what sort of increase thereafter.
This *change* rule is the basis for the bots claiming the entire problem of cancellation is on the insurance companies.
My husband is on a professional massage forum where a bot posted last week in favor of zer0care. He had no one agreeing with him.He segued to “give it a chance”. He included reflexive jabs at Republicans, Tea Party and insurance companies. Yesterday, he took his discussions/rants private with the few people who had successfully raised real issues with him.
Even the bots are seeking cover.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.