Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DuncanWaring
"They actually fought well in the early days of the Great War."

The French soldiers fought as bravely and fiercely as anyone. But the French Generalship was terrible, English generalship only slightly better. Had Pershing been made supreme commander the war would have ended in 1917 with a German surrender. Loses on both sides were simply terrible. Frontal assaults on machine gun emplacements was the rule. At least at Gettysburg American generals learned not to frontally assault strong positions if it could be avoided.

39 posted on 11/10/2013 6:23:52 AM PST by jpsb (Believe nothing until it has been officially denied)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: jpsb
Frontal assaults on machine gun emplacements was the rule.

Described by someone (Winston Churchill?) as "Young men trying to wear-out machine guns with their chests".

46 posted on 11/10/2013 8:19:40 AM PST by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: jpsb
But the French Generalship was terrible

Fallout from the French Revolution.

They guillotined any Frenchman of exceptional intelligence or leadership skills.

Since then they've succeed only when lead by foreigners...

52 posted on 11/10/2013 9:19:42 AM PST by null and void (I'm betting on an Obama Trifecta: A Nobel Peace Prize, an Impeachment, AND a War Crimes Trial...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson