What did they get wrong?
According to the article, they had a dude on that said he was at the compound during the attacks. However, his initial report to the FBI said he was not there.
The guy who have them the report supposedly lied about actually having been there - he said in an earlier report to the FBI that he hadn’t been present.
The mistake they now realize they made, was that they actually reported on Benghazi. Their masters were not happy.
They forgot to cross a “t” and dot an “i”!
Good question!
After reading the thread article, it looks like Holder’s FBI fed the Left-Stream Washington Post just enough information to convince Logan that the Holder’s FBI interpretation of events were more valid than their source.
Thus came a typical suit-requested ‘we-are-so-sorry-for-trying-to-find-out-the-truth-and-promise-to-never-do-it-again,’ “twisting in in the wind,” apology from Logan.
Since Holder’s FBI took 3 weeks to get to Benghazi to “investigate,” why should ANYTHING Holder’s FBI says be held up as “valid?”
Is Holder using his FBI to fend off, and shut down any Media investigations from finding out what really happened before during and after the joint Obama/Clinton designed Benghazi Massacre?
What are the High Crimes, and Derelictions of Duty that the Obama Administration has been trying to cover up for the last 14 months?
Which Media outlet will be the first to break the Benghazi Massacre Cover Up Story?
What effect will the public revealing of truth of the Benghazi Massacre Cover Up have on the election campaigns of Democrats in the 2014 and 2016 Federal elections?
Will the Left-Stream Media dare to award a Pulitzer Prize to the Media outlet journalist who breaks the story first?
The TRUTH eventually always comes out, the only question is “Who will uncover THE TRUTH first?”
Well I think this Dylan Davies was there and every word he told Logan was correct. If he changed his story when he was grilled by the FBI it was because he didn’t want to die.
This is a massive cover-up.